8 extractive question-and-answer pairs built from Assessment of bio-intensive management for fruit fly {Bactrocera cucurbitae(Coq.)} of Muskmelon under field condition | Annals of Agricultural Research, published by epubs.icar.org.in. Source-evidenced topics include bio-intensive management, fruit fly, bactrocera cucurbitae, muskmelon, chlorantraniliprole 18.5 sc, fruit fly trap, fruit infestation, fruit yield. Every answer is a verbatim span of text the source prints, and each row carries the passage it sits in, its offset in that passage, the source quote, the page and the location in the document, so any row can be checked against the original. Question types in the export: 4 factual, 2 comparison, 1 list, 1 summary. 4 of the 8 pairs (50.0%) ask explanatory questions; the remaining 4 are factual or table-based questions. 100.00% of rows pass the corpus quality gate.
This dataset examines the effectiveness of bio-intensive management techniques, including Chlorantraniliprole 18.5 SC and fruit fly traps, in reducing fruit fly infestation and improving muskmelon yield in Jaipur's Chomu block during 2021 and 2022. It includes eight extractive question-and-answer pairs derived from a study published in the Annals of Agricultural Research. The data highlights comparisons between assessed technology, farmer practices, and control methods in terms of fruit yield, infestation rates, and economic returns.
Browse more agriculture datasets, including other records from the same source when available.
Explore Agriculture datasetsAgronomic zinc biofortification of potato (Solanum tuberosum) through soil and foliar zinc sulphate application in Rajasthan | The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences - Question and Answer Dataset
Agriculture · 6 rows
Assessment on therapeutic value and diversity analysis in traditional rice (Oryza sativa) landraces of Tamil Nadu | The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences - Question and Answer Dataset
Agriculture · 13 rows
Assessment of avoidable yield losses due to insect pests and diseases in wheat (Triticum aestivum) | The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences - Question and Answer Dataset
Agriculture · 12 rows
Bhat (Black soybean):A sustainable choice for hill farming | Indian Farming - Question and Answer Dataset
Health · 6 rows
ICAR Annual Report 2023-24 - Question and Answer
Agriculture · 590 rows
ICAR Annual Report 2023-24 — Question and Answer Dataset
Agriculture · 590 rows
Bio-smart technologies for increasing shelf life and postharvest disease management in fruits for distant and export markets | Indian Horticulture - Question and Answer Dataset
Agriculture · 5 rows
Agricultural growth and its impact on gross state value added: An econometric analysis of major crop sectors in Haryana | The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences - Question and Answer Dataset
Agriculture · 9 rows
Use the API URL with your free DD token in notebooks, scripts, and pipelines.
https://www.desidata.in/api/datasets/epubs-icar-org-in-78fe39243674eb709742b10866618a95/downloadDataset downloads are free. For Python or API downloads, sign in once and create a free DD token; set it as DD_TOKEN or save it in your notebook's secrets. Requests are linked to your account so your download history and counts stay accurate.
# One-time install: pip install desidata
# Set DD_TOKEN in your environment first (create a free token in Profile & settings).
import desidata
df = desidata.load("epubs-icar-org-in-78fe39243674eb709742b10866618a95")
df.head()First 8 of 8 rows
| question | answer | context | answer_start | question_type | knowledge_quality_score | source_document | source_quote | source_page | source_location | confidence | validation_status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| What was the fruit yield in the assessed treatment during 2021 and 2022? | 275 qha-1 in the year 2021 and 285 q ha-1 2022 | Considering of muskmelon cultivation importance in Chomu block of Jaipur district, an experiment was conducted during summer season (February- May 2021 and 2022) at Jaisinghpura (Chomu) to evaluate field efficacy of Chlorantraniliprole 18. SC+ fruit fly trap. Cumulative pooled data on percent fruit infestation showed low fruit infestation (11.14%) in assessed treatment (T2) as compared to farmer practice (T1-17.75%) and control (26.12%). two-year cumulative pooled data on number of infested fruit plants-1 exhibited lowest number of fruit infestation i.e. 0.94 fruit plant-1 in assessed treatment as compared to farmer practice (2.03 fruit plant-1) and control (3.31 fruit plant-1). Fruit yield in assessed treatment was 275 qha-1 in the year 2021 and 285 q ha-1 2022. the control yield of fruit was 190 and 205 q ha-1 during year 2021 and 2022, respectively. | 726 | summary | 0.970 | https://epubs.icar.org.in/index.php/AAR/article/view/154086 | Fruit yield in assessed treatment was 275 qha-1 in the year 2021 and 285 q ha-1 2022. | p[0] | 0.700 | valid | |
| How much higher was the net return of assessed technology compared to control during 2022? | Rs. 1,89,000 ha-1 higher to control | In farmer practice, fruit yield was 250 qha-1 for year 2021 and 240 q ha-1 for 2022, as compared to assessed technology. Net return of assessed technology for the year 2021 was Rs. 4,92,500 ha-1 and that was Rs.1,97,900 ha-1 more as compared to control (Rs.2,94,600 ha-1), however net return of farmer practice was Rs. 4,34,500. for the year 2022 net return was Rs. 5,28,300 ha-1, Rs. 4,19,800 ha-1 and Rs. 3,39,300 ha-1 of assessed technology, farmer practice and control, respectively. During the aforesaid year, net return of assessed technology was Rs. 1,89,000 ha-1 higher to control. Economic performance of assessed technology was superior to farmer practice during both the years. | 553 | comparison | 0.920 | https://epubs.icar.org.in/index.php/AAR/article/view/154086 | During the aforesaid year, net return of assessed technology was Rs. 1,89,000 ha-1 higher to control. | p[0] | 0.700 | valid | |
| What was the net return of assessed technology compared to control for the year 2021? | Rs. 4,92,500 ha-1 and that was Rs.1,97,900 ha-1 more as compared to control (Rs.2,94,600 ha-1) | In farmer practice, fruit yield was 250 qha-1 for year 2021 and 240 q ha-1 for 2022, as compared to assessed technology. Net return of assessed technology for the year 2021 was Rs. 4,92,500 ha-1 and that was Rs.1,97,900 ha-1 more as compared to control (Rs.2,94,600 ha-1), however net return of farmer practice was Rs. 4,34,500. for the year 2022 net return was Rs. 5,28,300 ha-1, Rs. 4,19,800 ha-1 and Rs. 3,39,300 ha-1 of assessed technology, farmer practice and control, respectively. During the aforesaid year, net return of assessed technology was Rs. 1,89,000 ha-1 higher to control. Economic performance of assessed technology was superior to farmer practice during both the years. | 177 | comparison | 0.920 | https://epubs.icar.org.in/index.php/AAR/article/view/154086 | Net return of assessed technology for the year 2021 was Rs. 4,92,500 ha-1 and that was Rs.1,97,900 ha-1 more as compared to control (Rs.2,94,600 ha-1), however net return of farmer practice was Rs. | p[0] | 0.700 | ||
| What was the net return of assessed technology, farmer practice, and control for the year 2022? | Rs. 5,28,300 ha-1, Rs. 4,19,800 ha-1 and Rs. 3,39,300 ha-1 | In farmer practice, fruit yield was 250 qha-1 for year 2021 and 240 q ha-1 for 2022, as compared to assessed technology. Net return of assessed technology for the year 2021 was Rs. 4,92,500 ha-1 and that was Rs.1,97,900 ha-1 more as compared to control (Rs.2,94,600 ha-1), however net return of farmer practice was Rs. 4,34,500. for the year 2022 net return was Rs. 5,28,300 ha-1, Rs. 4,19,800 ha-1 and Rs. 3,39,300 ha-1 of assessed technology, farmer practice and control, respectively. During the aforesaid year, net return of assessed technology was Rs. 1,89,000 ha-1 higher to control. Economic performance of assessed technology was superior to farmer practice during both the years. | 362 | list | 0.820 | https://epubs.icar.org.in/index.php/AAR/article/view/154086 | for the year 2022 net return was Rs. 5,28,300 ha-1, Rs. 4,19,800 ha-1 and Rs. 3,39,300 ha-1 of assessed technology, farmer practice and control, respectively. | p[0] | 0.700 | valid | |
| What was the control yield of fruit during 2021 and 2022? | 190 and 205 q ha-1 during year 2021 and 2022, respectively | Considering of muskmelon cultivation importance in Chomu block of Jaipur district, an experiment was conducted during summer season (February- May 2021 and 2022) at Jaisinghpura (Chomu) to evaluate field efficacy of Chlorantraniliprole 18. SC+ fruit fly trap. Cumulative pooled data on percent fruit infestation showed low fruit infestation (11.14%) in assessed treatment (T2) as compared to farmer practice (T1-17.75%) and control (26.12%). two-year cumulative pooled data on number of infested fruit plants-1 exhibited lowest number of fruit infestation i.e. 0.94 fruit plant-1 in assessed treatment as compared to farmer practice (2.03 fruit plant-1) and control (3.31 fruit plant-1). Fruit yield in assessed treatment was 275 qha-1 in the year 2021 and 285 q ha-1 2022. the control yield of fruit was 190 and 205 q ha-1 during year 2021 and 2022, respectively. | 805 | factual | 0.570 | https://epubs.icar.org.in/index.php/AAR/article/view/154086 | the control yield of fruit was 190 and 205 q ha-1 during year 2021 and 2022, respectively. | p[0] | 0.700 | ||
| What was the fruit yield under farmer practice for the years 2021 and 2022? | 250 qha-1 for year 2021 and 240 q ha-1 for 2022 | In farmer practice, fruit yield was 250 qha-1 for year 2021 and 240 q ha-1 for 2022, as compared to assessed technology. Net return of assessed technology for the year 2021 was Rs. 4,92,500 ha-1 and that was Rs.1,97,900 ha-1 more as compared to control (Rs.2,94,600 ha-1), however net return of farmer practice was Rs. 4,34,500. for the year 2022 net return was Rs. 5,28,300 ha-1, Rs. 4,19,800 ha-1 and Rs. 3,39,300 ha-1 of assessed technology, farmer practice and control, respectively. During the aforesaid year, net return of assessed technology was Rs. 1,89,000 ha-1 higher to control. Economic performance of assessed technology was superior to farmer practice during both the years. | 36 | factual | 0.570 | https://epubs.icar.org.in/index.php/AAR/article/view/154086 | In farmer practice, fruit yield was 250 qha-1 for year 2021 and 240 q ha-1 for 2022, as compared to assessed technology. | p[0] | 0.700 | valid | |
| How many fruit plant-1 in assessed treatment as compared to farmer practice (2.03 fruit plant-1) and control (3.31 fruit plant-1)? | 0.94 | Similarly, two-year cumulative pooled data on number of infested fruit plants-1 exhibited lowest number of fruit infestation i.e. 0.94 fruit plant-1 in assessed treatment as compared to farmer practice (2.03 fruit plant-1) and control (3.31 fruit plant-1). Fruit yield in assessed treatment was 275 qha-1 in the year 2021 and 285 q ha-1 2022. | 130 | factual | 0.370 | https://epubs.icar.org.in/index.php/AAR/article/view/154086 | two-year cumulative pooled data on number of infested fruit plants-1 exhibited lowest number of fruit infestation i.e. 0.94 fruit plant-1 in assessed treatment as compared to farmer practice (2.03 fruit plant-1) and control (3.31 fruit plant-1). | p[0] | 0.800 | valid | |
| How many q ha-1 for 2022, as compared to assessed technology? | 240 | However, the control yield of fruit was 190 and 205 q ha-1 during year 2021 and 2022, respectively. In farmer practice, fruit yield was 250 qha-1 for year 2021 and 240 q ha-1 for 2022, as compared to assessed technology. Net return of assessed technology for the year 2021 was Rs. | 164 | factual | 0.370 | https://epubs.icar.org.in/index.php/AAR/article/view/154086 | In farmer practice, fruit yield was 250 qha-1 for year 2021 and 240 q ha-1 for 2022, as compared to assessed technology. | p[0] | 0.800 | valid |
Read straight from the file — download or use the API URL for the full dataset.
| valid |
| valid |