11 extractive question-and-answer pairs built from Agronomic and biochemical attributes and economic indices of sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum) in saline vis-a-vis non-saline soils | The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, published by epubs.icar.org.in. Source-evidenced topics include biochemical attributes, economic indices, sugarcane, saccharum officinarum, saline soils, non-saline soils, soil salinity, tss content. Every answer is a verbatim span of text the source prints, and each row carries the passage it sits in, its offset in that passage, the source quote, the page and the location in the document, so any row can be checked against the original. Question types in the export: 8 factual, 2 relationship, 1 list. 3 of the 11 pairs (27.3%) ask explanatory questions; the remaining 8 are factual or table-based questions. 90.91% of rows pass the corpus quality gate.
This dataset includes 11 extractive question-and-answer pairs from a study on sugarcane agronomic and biochemical attributes in saline and non-saline soils. It explores the effects of soil salinity on sugarcane cultivars, such as reductions in plant height, sucrose content, and juice purity. Additionally, the dataset provides metadata about The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, including its indexing platforms and ISSN numbers.
Browse more agriculture datasets, including other records from the same source when available.
Explore Agriculture datasetsAgronomic zinc biofortification of potato (Solanum tuberosum) through soil and foliar zinc sulphate application in Rajasthan | The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences - Question and Answer Dataset
Agriculture · 6 rows
Assessment on therapeutic value and diversity analysis in traditional rice (Oryza sativa) landraces of Tamil Nadu | The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences - Question and Answer Dataset
Agriculture · 13 rows
Assessment of avoidable yield losses due to insect pests and diseases in wheat (Triticum aestivum) | The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences - Question and Answer Dataset
Agriculture · 12 rows
Bhat (Black soybean):A sustainable choice for hill farming | Indian Farming - Question and Answer Dataset
Health · 6 rows
ICAR Annual Report 2023-24 - Question and Answer
Agriculture · 590 rows
ICAR Annual Report 2023-24 — Question and Answer Dataset
Agriculture · 590 rows
Bio-smart technologies for increasing shelf life and postharvest disease management in fruits for distant and export markets | Indian Horticulture - Question and Answer Dataset
Agriculture · 5 rows
Agricultural growth and its impact on gross state value added: An econometric analysis of major crop sectors in Haryana | The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences - Question and Answer Dataset
Agriculture · 9 rows
Use the API URL with your free DD token in notebooks, scripts, and pipelines.
https://www.desidata.in/api/datasets/epubs-icar-org-in-4e0bae248bf1e9db4373ad28fe862566/downloadDataset downloads are free. For Python or API downloads, sign in once and create a free DD token; set it as DD_TOKEN or save it in your notebook's secrets. Requests are linked to your account so your download history and counts stay accurate.
# One-time install: pip install desidata
# Set DD_TOKEN in your environment first (create a free token in Profile & settings).
import desidata
df = desidata.load("epubs-icar-org-in-4e0bae248bf1e9db4373ad28fe862566")
df.head()First 10 of 11 rows
| question | answer | context | answer_start | question_type | knowledge_quality_score | source_document | source_quote | source_page | source_location | confidence | validation_status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Which platforms index The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences? | Elsevier Scopus, Clarivate Analytics ESCI, DOAJ | This work is licensed under aCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4. International License. The copyright of the articles published inThe Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciencesis vested with the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, which reserves the right to enter into any agreement with any organization in India or abroad, for reprography, photocopying, storage and dissemination of information. The Council has no objection to using the material, provided the information is not being utilized for commercial purposes and wherever the information is being used, proper credit is given to ICAR. Print ISSN:0019-5022Online ISSN:2394-3319NAAS Rating (2026):6.7WoS Impact Factor (June 2026):0. Indexedin Elsevier Scopus, Clarivate Analytics ESCI, DOAJ.Plagiarism checkby iThenticate.The work is licensed underAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4. | 727 | list | 0.820 | https://epubs.icar.org.in/index.php/IJAgS/article/view/130246 | Indexedin Elsevier Scopus, Clarivate Analytics ESCI, DOAJ.Plagiarism checkby iThenticate.The work is licensed underAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4. | p[19] | 0.700 | valid | |
| What was the decrease in sugar recovery in saline soil? | by ~21.4% | Juice purity showed large variation in saline soils (37.9-98.7%) than the non-saline soil (88.9–96.4%), and was significantly lowest for CoPb-18213, and highest for CoPb-18214. Sugar recovery was decreased by ~21.4% in saline soil. Average gross returns were significantly higher for CoPb-19211, compared with the others. Mean economic efficiency of 7. US$/ha/d for saline and 9. US/ha/d showed ~17.2% increase for non-saline soil. | 206 | relationship | 0.770 | https://epubs.icar.org.in/index.php/IJAgS/article/view/130246 | Sugar recovery was decreased by ~21.4% in saline soil. | p[0] | 0.700 | valid | |
| What was the impact of soil salinity on the plant height of sugarcane cultivars? | by ~66.6% | The study evaluated the yield and biochemical attributes of eight sugarcane (Saccharum officinarumL.) cultivars (CoPb-18211, CoPb-18212, CoPb-18213, CoPb-18214, CoPb-19211, CoPb-19212, CoPb-19213 and CoPb-19214) in saline and non-saline soils during 2019–20 at Punjab Agricultural University, Punjab farms at village-Ruldu Singh Wala (Bathinda) and at village-Ratta Khera (Sri Muktsar Sahib). Soil salinity significantly (P<0.05) decreased the plant height (by ~66.6%), tillers/plant (~36%), cane diameter at ground surface (~79.8%) and diameter at breast height (~93.1%) than the non-saline soil. Soil salinity significantly decreased the TSS content in juice (by ~7.1%), sucrose (~55.6%) and titratable acidity (~11.0%) than the non-saline soil. | 458 | relationship | 0.770 | https://epubs.icar.org.in/index.php/IJAgS/article/view/130246 | Soil salinity significantly (P<0.05) decreased the plant height (by ~66.6%), tillers/plant (~36%), cane diameter at ground surface (~79.8%) and diameter at breast height (~93.1%) than the non-saline soil. | p[0] | 0.700 | ||
| What organization holds the copyright for articles published in The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences? | Indian Council of Agricultural Research | This work is licensed under aCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4. International License. The copyright of the articles published inThe Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciencesis vested with the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, which reserves the right to enter into any agreement with any organization in India or abroad, for reprography, photocopying, storage and dissemination of information. The Council has no objection to using the material, provided the information is not being utilized for commercial purposes and wherever the information is being used, proper credit is given to ICAR. Print ISSN:0019-5022Online ISSN:2394-3319NAAS Rating (2026):6.7WoS Impact Factor (June 2026):0. Indexedin Elsevier Scopus, Clarivate Analytics ESCI, DOAJ.Plagiarism checkby iThenticate.The work is licensed underAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4. | 213 | factual | 0.570 | https://epubs.icar.org.in/index.php/IJAgS/article/view/130246 | The copyright of the articles published inThe Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciencesis vested with the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, which reserves the right to enter into any agreement with any organization in India or abroad, for reprography, photocopying, storage and dissemination of information. | ||||
| What is the NAAS Rating of The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences for the year 2026? | 6.7 | This work is licensed under aCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4. International License. The copyright of the articles published inThe Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciencesis vested with the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, which reserves the right to enter into any agreement with any organization in India or abroad, for reprography, photocopying, storage and dissemination of information. The Council has no objection to using the material, provided the information is not being utilized for commercial purposes and wherever the information is being used, proper credit is given to ICAR. Print ISSN:0019-5022Online ISSN:2394-3319NAAS Rating (2026):6.7WoS Impact Factor (June 2026):0. Indexedin Elsevier Scopus, Clarivate Analytics ESCI, DOAJ.Plagiarism checkby iThenticate.The work is licensed underAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4. | 681 | factual | 0.370 | https://epubs.icar.org.in/index.php/IJAgS/article/view/130246 | Print ISSN:0019-5022Online ISSN:2394-3319NAAS Rating (2026):6.7WoS Impact Factor (June 2026):0. | p[19] | 0.700 | ||
| What is the WoS Impact Factor of The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences as of June 2026? | 0 | This work is licensed under aCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4. International License. The copyright of the articles published inThe Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciencesis vested with the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, which reserves the right to enter into any agreement with any organization in India or abroad, for reprography, photocopying, storage and dissemination of information. The Council has no objection to using the material, provided the information is not being utilized for commercial purposes and wherever the information is being used, proper credit is given to ICAR. Print ISSN:0019-5022Online ISSN:2394-3319NAAS Rating (2026):6.7WoS Impact Factor (June 2026):0. Indexedin Elsevier Scopus, Clarivate Analytics ESCI, DOAJ.Plagiarism checkby iThenticate.The work is licensed underAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4. | 632 | factual | 0.370 | https://epubs.icar.org.in/index.php/IJAgS/article/view/130246 | Print ISSN:0019-5022Online ISSN:2394-3319NAAS Rating (2026):6.7WoS Impact Factor (June 2026):0. | p[19] | 0.700 | ||
| What is the online ISSN number for The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences? | 2394-3319 | This work is licensed under aCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4. International License. The copyright of the articles published inThe Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciencesis vested with the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, which reserves the right to enter into any agreement with any organization in India or abroad, for reprography, photocopying, storage and dissemination of information. The Council has no objection to using the material, provided the information is not being utilized for commercial purposes and wherever the information is being used, proper credit is given to ICAR. Print ISSN:0019-5022Online ISSN:2394-3319NAAS Rating (2026):6.7WoS Impact Factor (June 2026):0. Indexedin Elsevier Scopus, Clarivate Analytics ESCI, DOAJ.Plagiarism checkby iThenticate.The work is licensed underAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4. | 653 | factual | 0.370 | https://epubs.icar.org.in/index.php/IJAgS/article/view/130246 | Print ISSN:0019-5022Online ISSN:2394-3319NAAS Rating (2026):6.7WoS Impact Factor (June 2026):0. | p[19] | 0.700 | ||
| What is the print ISSN number for The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences? | 0019-5022 | This work is licensed under aCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4. International License. The copyright of the articles published inThe Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciencesis vested with the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, which reserves the right to enter into any agreement with any organization in India or abroad, for reprography, photocopying, storage and dissemination of information. The Council has no objection to using the material, provided the information is not being utilized for commercial purposes and wherever the information is being used, proper credit is given to ICAR. Print ISSN:0019-5022Online ISSN:2394-3319NAAS Rating (2026):6.7WoS Impact Factor (June 2026):0. Indexedin Elsevier Scopus, Clarivate Analytics ESCI, DOAJ.Plagiarism checkby iThenticate.The work is licensed underAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4. | 632 | factual | 0.370 | https://epubs.icar.org.in/index.php/IJAgS/article/view/130246 | Print ISSN:0019-5022Online ISSN:2394-3319NAAS Rating (2026):6.7WoS Impact Factor (June 2026):0. | p[19] | 0.700 | ||
| What is the range of juice purity observed in saline soils? | 37.9-98.7% | Juice purity showed large variation in saline soils (37.9-98.7%) than the non-saline soil (88.9–96.4%), and was significantly lowest for CoPb-18213, and highest for CoPb-18214. Sugar recovery was decreased by ~21.4% in saline soil. Average gross returns were significantly higher for CoPb-19211, compared with the others. Mean economic efficiency of 7. US$/ha/d for saline and 9. US/ha/d showed ~17.2% increase for non-saline soil. | 53 | factual | 0.370 | https://epubs.icar.org.in/index.php/IJAgS/article/view/130246 | Juice purity showed large variation in saline soils (37.9-98.7%) than the non-saline soil (88.9–96.4%), and was significantly lowest for CoPb-18213, and highest for CoPb-18214. | p[0] | 0.700 | valid | |
| Which sugarcane cultivar had the greatest juice purity in saline soils? | CoPb-18214 | Juice purity showed large variation in saline soils (37.9-98.7%) than the non-saline soil (88.9–96.4%), and was significantly lowest for CoPb-18213, and highest for CoPb-18214. Sugar recovery was decreased by ~21.4% in saline soil. Average gross returns were significantly higher for CoPb-19211, compared with the others. Mean economic efficiency of 7. US$/ha/d for saline and 9. US/ha/d showed ~17.2% increase for non-saline soil. | 165 | factual | 0.370 | https://epubs.icar.org.in/index.php/IJAgS/article/view/130246 | Juice purity showed large variation in saline soils (37.9-98.7%) than the non-saline soil (88.9–96.4%), and was significantly lowest for CoPb-18213, and highest for CoPb-18214. | p[0] | 0.700 | valid |
Read straight from the file — download or use the API URL for the full dataset.
| valid |
| p[19] |
| 0.700 |
| valid |
| valid |
| valid |
| valid |
| valid |