3 extractive question-and-answer pairs built from A statistical analysis of inter-state disparities in agricultural development across India, published by epubs.icar.org.in. Source-evidenced topics include agricultural development, inter-state disparities, punjab, west bengal, gujarat, kerala, odisha, haryana. Every answer is a verbatim span of text the source prints, and each row carries the passage it sits in, its offset in that passage, the source quote, the page and the location in the document, so any row can be checked against the original. Question types in the export: 2 list, 1 summary. 3 of the 3 pairs (100.0%) ask explanatory questions; the remaining 0 are factual or table-based questions. 100.00% of rows pass the corpus quality gate.
This dataset examines inter-state disparities in agricultural development across India for the years 2019–20 to 2021–22. Using composite indices derived from 28 agricultural development indicators, states were ranked and categorized into development levels. The analysis highlights regional leaders in agricultural development and provides a range of Composite Index scores for states. The dataset includes three extractive question-and-answer pairs sourced from a published study.
Browse more agriculture datasets, including other records from the same source when available.
Explore Agriculture datasetsAgronomic zinc biofortification of potato (Solanum tuberosum) through soil and foliar zinc sulphate application in Rajasthan | The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences - Question and Answer Dataset
Agriculture · 6 rows
Assessment on therapeutic value and diversity analysis in traditional rice (Oryza sativa) landraces of Tamil Nadu | The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences - Question and Answer Dataset
Agriculture · 13 rows
Assessment of avoidable yield losses due to insect pests and diseases in wheat (Triticum aestivum) | The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences - Question and Answer Dataset
Agriculture · 12 rows
Bhat (Black soybean):A sustainable choice for hill farming | Indian Farming - Question and Answer Dataset
Health · 6 rows
ICAR Annual Report 2023-24 - Question and Answer
Agriculture · 590 rows
ICAR Annual Report 2023-24 — Question and Answer Dataset
Agriculture · 590 rows
Bio-smart technologies for increasing shelf life and postharvest disease management in fruits for distant and export markets | Indian Horticulture - Question and Answer Dataset
Agriculture · 5 rows
Agricultural growth and its impact on gross state value added: An econometric analysis of major crop sectors in Haryana | The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences - Question and Answer Dataset
Agriculture · 9 rows
Use the API URL with your free DD token in notebooks, scripts, and pipelines.
https://www.desidata.in/api/datasets/epubs-icar-org-in-38bccfdc855698e7439d3c45319c0c49/downloadDataset downloads are free. For Python or API downloads, sign in once and create a free DD token; set it as DD_TOKEN or save it in your notebook's secrets. Requests are linked to your account so your download history and counts stay accurate.
# One-time install: pip install desidata
# Set DD_TOKEN in your environment first (create a free token in Profile & settings).
import desidata
df = desidata.load("epubs-icar-org-in-38bccfdc855698e7439d3c45319c0c49")
df.head()First 3 of 3 rows
| question | answer | context | answer_start | question_type | knowledge_quality_score | source_document | source_quote | source_page | source_location | confidence | validation_status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| What was the range of state-wise Composite Index scores in agricultural development? | 0.47 in Punjab to 0.83 in Odisha | A comparative analysis of inter-state variations for three years i.e. 2019–20 to 2021–22 in agricultural development across India had been done by using secondary data from the major agricultural states for 28 key development indicators related to agriculture for Triennium Ending (TE) 2022. The composite indices of development based on the optimum combination of indicators related to agriculture had been worked out for four zones and the overall agricultural states of India. The results of Composite Index (CI) showed that Punjab (0.32), West Bengal (0.37), Gujarat (0.52), and Kerala (0.58) ranked highest in the north, east, west, and south zones, respectively. the state-wise CI ranged from 0.47 in Punjab to 0.83 in Odisha. The states were further ranked and categorised into high (H), high middle (HM), low middle (LM), and low (L) levels of development. | 699 | summary | 0.970 | https://epubs.icar.org.in/index.php/IJAgS/article/view/157913 | the state-wise CI ranged from 0.47 in Punjab to 0.83 in Odisha. | p[0] | 0.700 | valid | |
| How were the states categorised based on their Composite Index scores? | high (H), high middle (HM), low middle (LM), and low (L) levels of development | A comparative analysis of inter-state variations for three years i.e. 2019–20 to 2021–22 in agricultural development across India had been done by using secondary data from the major agricultural states for 28 key development indicators related to agriculture for Triennium Ending (TE) 2022. The composite indices of development based on the optimum combination of indicators related to agriculture had been worked out for four zones and the overall agricultural states of India. The results of Composite Index (CI) showed that Punjab (0.32), West Bengal (0.37), Gujarat (0.52), and Kerala (0.58) ranked highest in the north, east, west, and south zones, respectively. the state-wise CI ranged from 0.47 in Punjab to 0.83 in Odisha. The states were further ranked and categorised into high (H), high middle (HM), low middle (LM), and low (L) levels of development. | 785 | list | 0.820 | https://epubs.icar.org.in/index.php/IJAgS/article/view/157913 | The states were further ranked and categorised into high (H), high middle (HM), low middle (LM), and low (L) levels of development. | ||||
| Which states ranked highest in the east and west zones according to the Composite Index? | West Bengal (0.37), Gujarat (0.52) | A comparative analysis of inter-state variations for three years i.e. 2019–20 to 2021–22 in agricultural development across India had been done by using secondary data from the major agricultural states for 28 key development indicators related to agriculture for Triennium Ending (TE) 2022. The composite indices of development based on the optimum combination of indicators related to agriculture had been worked out for four zones and the overall agricultural states of India. The results of Composite Index (CI) showed that Punjab (0.32), West Bengal (0.37), Gujarat (0.52), and Kerala (0.58) ranked highest in the north, east, west, and south zones, respectively. the state-wise CI ranged from 0.47 in Punjab to 0.83 in Odisha. The states were further ranked and categorised into high (H), high middle (HM), low middle (LM), and low (L) levels of development. | 543 | list | 0.820 | https://epubs.icar.org.in/index.php/IJAgS/article/view/157913 | The results of Composite Index (CI) showed that Punjab (0.32), West Bengal (0.37), Gujarat (0.52), and Kerala (0.58) ranked highest in the north, east, west, and south zones, respectively. |
Read straight from the file — download or use the API URL for the full dataset.
| p[0] |
| 0.700 |
| valid |
| p[0] |
| 0.700 |
| valid |