16 extractive question-and-answer pairs built from Assessment of G × E interactions using AMMI, GGE biplot and stability analysis in blackgram (Vigna mungo) | The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, published by epubs.icar.org.in. Source-evidenced topics include g × e interactions, ammi analysis, gge biplot, stability analysis, blackgram, vigna mungo, grain yield, genotypes. Every answer is a verbatim span of text the source prints, and each row carries the passage it sits in, its offset in that passage, the source quote, the page and the location in the document, so any row can be checked against the original. Question types in the export: 8 list, 6 factual, 1 relationship, 1 summary. 10 of the 16 pairs (62.5%) ask explanatory questions; the remaining 6 are factual or table-based questions. 100.00% of rows pass the corpus quality gate.
This dataset contains 16 question-and-answer pairs derived from a study on genotype-environment (G × E) interactions in blackgram (Vigna mungo) conducted at the National Pulses Research Station, Pudukkottai, Tamil Nadu. The study utilized AMMI and GGE biplot models to assess stability and grain yield across five seasons with varying climatic conditions. Key findings include the identification of stable and high-yielding genotypes, as well as specific genotype-environment interactions. The dataset also includes metadata about the journal's indexing and licensing details.
Browse more agriculture datasets, including other records from the same source when available.
Explore Agriculture datasetsAgronomic zinc biofortification of potato (Solanum tuberosum) through soil and foliar zinc sulphate application in Rajasthan | The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences - Question and Answer Dataset
Agriculture · 6 rows
Assessment on therapeutic value and diversity analysis in traditional rice (Oryza sativa) landraces of Tamil Nadu | The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences - Question and Answer Dataset
Agriculture · 13 rows
Assessment of avoidable yield losses due to insect pests and diseases in wheat (Triticum aestivum) | The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences - Question and Answer Dataset
Agriculture · 12 rows
Bhat (Black soybean):A sustainable choice for hill farming | Indian Farming - Question and Answer Dataset
Health · 6 rows
ICAR Annual Report 2023-24 - Question and Answer
Agriculture · 590 rows
ICAR Annual Report 2023-24 — Question and Answer Dataset
Agriculture · 590 rows
Bio-smart technologies for increasing shelf life and postharvest disease management in fruits for distant and export markets | Indian Horticulture - Question and Answer Dataset
Agriculture · 5 rows
Agricultural growth and its impact on gross state value added: An econometric analysis of major crop sectors in Haryana | The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences - Question and Answer Dataset
Agriculture · 9 rows
Use the API URL with your free DD token in notebooks, scripts, and pipelines.
https://www.desidata.in/api/datasets/epubs-icar-org-in-292bca125db2b140301284640647868a/downloadDataset downloads are free. For Python or API downloads, sign in once and create a free DD token; set it as DD_TOKEN or save it in your notebook's secrets. Requests are linked to your account so your download history and counts stay accurate.
# One-time install: pip install desidata
# Set DD_TOKEN in your environment first (create a free token in Profile & settings).
import desidata
df = desidata.load("epubs-icar-org-in-292bca125db2b140301284640647868a")
df.head()First 10 of 16 rows
| question | answer | context | answer_start | question_type | knowledge_quality_score | source_document | source_quote | source_page | source_location | confidence | validation_status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Under what conditions can material from The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences be used? | provided the information is not being utilized for commercial purposes and wherever the information is being used, proper credit is given to ICAR | This work is licensed under aCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4. International License. The copyright of the articles published inThe Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciencesis vested with the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, which reserves the right to enter into any agreement with any organization in India or abroad, for reprography, photocopying, storage and dissemination of information. The Council has no objection to using the material, provided the information is not being utilized for commercial purposes and wherever the information is being used, proper credit is given to ICAR. Print ISSN:0019-5022Online ISSN:2394-3319NAAS Rating (2026):6.7WoS Impact Factor (June 2026):0. Indexedin Elsevier Scopus, Clarivate Analytics ESCI, DOAJ.Plagiarism checkby iThenticate.The work is licensed underAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4. | 474 | relationship | 0.970 | https://epubs.icar.org.in/index.php/IJAgS/article/view/155064 | The Council has no objection to using the material, provided the information is not being utilized for commercial purposes and wherever the information is being used, proper credit is given to ICAR. | p[28] | 0.700 | valid | |
| What was the goal of the experiment conducted at the National Pulses Research Station in Pudukkottai, Tamil Nadu? | to assess the stability over environments, G×E interaction through Finlay-Wilkinson, Eberhart and Russell model, AMMI analysis and GGE biplot model for grain yield | The experiment was conducted during rainy (kharif) 2020, winter (rabi)2020–21, summer 2021, rainy (kharif) 2021 and winter (rabi) 2021–22 at National Pulses Research Station, Pudukkottai, Tamil Nadu to assess the stability over environments, G×E interaction through Finlay-Wilkinson, Eberhart and Russell model, AMMI analysis and GGE biplot model for grain yield using 20 blackgram [Vigna mungo(L.)] genotypes in five consecutive seasons with climatic variations. Based on stability analysis the genotypes, viz. VBG17021, VBG17030, VBG18034 and VBN 8 were identified as more stable genotypes across environments with high yielding. In the AMMI model G×E interaction analysis disclosed that a total of 93.7% of interaction was contributed by the first three principal components viz. IPCA1, IPCA2, and IPCA3. | 199 | summary | 0.970 | https://epubs.icar.org.in/index.php/IJAgS/article/view/155064 | The experiment was conducted during rainy (kharif) 2020, winter (rabi)2020–21, summer 2021, rainy (kharif) 2021 and winter (rabi) 2021–22 at National Pulses Research Station, Pudukkottai, Tamil Nadu to assess the stability over environments, G×E interaction through Finlay-Wilkinson, Eberhart and Russell model, AMMI analysis and GGE biplot model for grain yield using 20 blackgram [Vigna mungo(L.)] genotypes in five consecutive seasons with climatic variations. | ||||
| Which genotypes exhibited a positive interaction with environment E2 during kharif 2020? | VBG18032 (G17) and VBG18040 (G20) | The genotypes VBG18048 (G5), VBG17026 (G14), VBG18034 (G18) and VBG18032 (G11) were recorded the IPCA1 values close to zero suggested that these were more stable across environments. The yield of these genotypes were also better than the best check variety VBN8. The genotypes, such as VBG18032 (G17) and VBG18040 (G20) had high positive IPCA1 values showed a positive interaction with the particular environments (E2). these genotypes can be recommended for the favourable environment E2(kharif2020), whereas the genotypes VBG18043 (G3) and VBG18047 (G4) can be recommended for another favourable environments E3and E5(rabi2020 and 2021). The results of AMMI biplot 1 and 2 and GGE biplot analysis, determined that VBG 18043 (G3) was more stable genotype coupled with high yielding across seasons. | 286 | list | 0.820 | https://epubs.icar.org.in/index.php/IJAgS/article/view/155064 | The genotypes, such as VBG18032 (G17) and VBG18040 (G20) had high positive IPCA1 values showed a positive interaction with the particular environments (E2). | p[0] | 0.700 | ||
| Which genotypes had IPCA1 values close to zero, indicating stability across environments? | VBG18048 (G5), VBG17026 (G14), VBG18034 (G18) and VBG18032 (G11) | The genotypes VBG18048 (G5), VBG17026 (G14), VBG18034 (G18) and VBG18032 (G11) were recorded the IPCA1 values close to zero suggested that these were more stable across environments. The yield of these genotypes were also better than the best check variety VBN8. The genotypes, such as VBG18032 (G17) and VBG18040 (G20) had high positive IPCA1 values showed a positive interaction with the particular environments (E2). these genotypes can be recommended for the favourable environment E2(kharif2020), whereas the genotypes VBG18043 (G3) and VBG18047 (G4) can be recommended for another favourable environments E3and E5(rabi2020 and 2021). The results of AMMI biplot 1 and 2 and GGE biplot analysis, determined that VBG 18043 (G3) was more stable genotype coupled with high yielding across seasons. | 14 | list | 0.820 | https://epubs.icar.org.in/index.php/IJAgS/article/view/155064 | The genotypes VBG18048 (G5), VBG17026 (G14), VBG18034 (G18) and VBG18032 (G11) were recorded the IPCA1 values close to zero suggested that these were more stable across environments. | p[0] | |||
| Which genotypes showed a positive interaction with environment E2 and had high positive IPCA1 values? | VBG18032 (G17) and VBG18040 (G20) | The genotypes VBG18048 (G5), VBG17026 (G14), VBG18034 (G18) and VBG18032 (G11) were recorded the IPCA1 values close to zero suggested that these were more stable across environments. The yield of these genotypes were also better than the best check variety VBN8. The genotypes, such as VBG18032 (G17) and VBG18040 (G20) had high positive IPCA1 values showed a positive interaction with the particular environments (E2). these genotypes can be recommended for the favourable environment E2(kharif2020), whereas the genotypes VBG18043 (G3) and VBG18047 (G4) can be recommended for another favourable environments E3and E5(rabi2020 and 2021). The results of AMMI biplot 1 and 2 and GGE biplot analysis, determined that VBG 18043 (G3) was more stable genotype coupled with high yielding across seasons. | 286 | list | 0.820 | https://epubs.icar.org.in/index.php/IJAgS/article/view/155064 | The genotypes, such as VBG18032 (G17) and VBG18040 (G20) had high positive IPCA1 values showed a positive interaction with the particular environments (E2). | p[0] | 0.700 | ||
| Which genotypes were found to be more stable and high yielding across environments? | VBG17021, VBG17030, VBG18034 and VBN 8 | The experiment was conducted during rainy (kharif) 2020, winter (rabi)2020–21, summer 2021, rainy (kharif) 2021 and winter (rabi) 2021–22 at National Pulses Research Station, Pudukkottai, Tamil Nadu to assess the stability over environments, G×E interaction through Finlay-Wilkinson, Eberhart and Russell model, AMMI analysis and GGE biplot model for grain yield using 20 blackgram [Vigna mungo(L.)] genotypes in five consecutive seasons with climatic variations. Based on stability analysis the genotypes, viz. VBG17021, VBG17030, VBG18034 and VBN 8 were identified as more stable genotypes across environments with high yielding. In the AMMI model G×E interaction analysis disclosed that a total of 93.7% of interaction was contributed by the first three principal components viz. IPCA1, IPCA2, and IPCA3. | 512 | list | 0.820 | https://epubs.icar.org.in/index.php/IJAgS/article/view/155064 | Based on stability analysis the genotypes, viz. VBG17021, VBG17030, VBG18034 and VBN 8 were identified as more stable genotypes across environments with high yielding. | p[0] | |||
| Which genotypes were identified as highly suitable for the kharif and rabi seasons in the 'which-won-where' model? | VBG18048 (G5) and VBG18034 (G18) | The “which- won- where” model of GGE biplot analysis showed that the genotypes VBG18048 (G5) and VBG18034 (G18) were highly suitable for thekharifandrabiseasons and VBG17030 (G16) was suitable for summer season. The analysis of all four models of G×E interaction clearly indicated that the genotype VBG18034 was identified as more stable in all the five environments. Agricultural Statistics Division, Directorate of Economics and Statistics aand Ministry of Agrictulture and Farmer's Welfare. 2022. | 79 | list | 0.820 | https://epubs.icar.org.in/index.php/IJAgS/article/view/155064 | The “which- won- where” model of GGE biplot analysis showed that the genotypes VBG18048 (G5) and VBG18034 (G18) were highly suitable for thekharifandrabiseasons and VBG17030 (G16) was suitable for summer season. | p[0] | 0.700 | valid | |
| Which indexing organizations include The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences? | Elsevier Scopus, Clarivate Analytics ESCI, DOAJ | This work is licensed under aCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4. International License. The copyright of the articles published inThe Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciencesis vested with the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, which reserves the right to enter into any agreement with any organization in India or abroad, for reprography, photocopying, storage and dissemination of information. The Council has no objection to using the material, provided the information is not being utilized for commercial purposes and wherever the information is being used, proper credit is given to ICAR. Print ISSN:0019-5022Online ISSN:2394-3319NAAS Rating (2026):6.7WoS Impact Factor (June 2026):0. Indexedin Elsevier Scopus, Clarivate Analytics ESCI, DOAJ.Plagiarism checkby iThenticate.The work is licensed underAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4. | 727 | list | 0.820 | https://epubs.icar.org.in/index.php/IJAgS/article/view/155064 | Indexedin Elsevier Scopus, Clarivate Analytics ESCI, DOAJ.Plagiarism checkby iThenticate.The work is licensed underAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4. | ||||
| What are the print and online ISSN numbers for The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences? | Print ISSN:0019-5022Online ISSN:2394-3319 | This work is licensed under aCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4. International License. The copyright of the articles published inThe Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciencesis vested with the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, which reserves the right to enter into any agreement with any organization in India or abroad, for reprography, photocopying, storage and dissemination of information. The Council has no objection to using the material, provided the information is not being utilized for commercial purposes and wherever the information is being used, proper credit is given to ICAR. Print ISSN:0019-5022Online ISSN:2394-3319NAAS Rating (2026):6.7WoS Impact Factor (June 2026):0. Indexedin Elsevier Scopus, Clarivate Analytics ESCI, DOAJ.Plagiarism checkby iThenticate.The work is licensed underAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4. | 621 | list | 0.740 | https://epubs.icar.org.in/index.php/IJAgS/article/view/155064 | The Council has no objection to using the material, provided the information is not being utilized for commercial purposes and wherever the information is being used, proper credit is given to ICAR. Print ISSN:0019-5022Online ISSN:2394-3319NAAS Rating (2026):6.7WoS Impact Factor (June 2026):0. | ||||
| Which environments were recommended for genotypes VBG18043 (G3) and VBG18047 (G4)? | E3and E5(rabi2020 and 2021) | The genotypes VBG18048 (G5), VBG17026 (G14), VBG18034 (G18) and VBG18032 (G11) were recorded the IPCA1 values close to zero suggested that these were more stable across environments. The yield of these genotypes were also better than the best check variety VBN8. The genotypes, such as VBG18032 (G17) and VBG18040 (G20) had high positive IPCA1 values showed a positive interaction with the particular environments (E2). these genotypes can be recommended for the favourable environment E2(kharif2020), whereas the genotypes VBG18043 (G3) and VBG18047 (G4) can be recommended for another favourable environments E3and E5(rabi2020 and 2021). The results of AMMI biplot 1 and 2 and GGE biplot analysis, determined that VBG 18043 (G3) was more stable genotype coupled with high yielding across seasons. | 611 | list | 0.740 | https://epubs.icar.org.in/index.php/IJAgS/article/view/155064 | these genotypes can be recommended for the favourable environment E2(kharif2020), whereas the genotypes VBG18043 (G3) and VBG18047 (G4) can be recommended for another favourable environments E3and E5(rabi2020 and 2021). | p[0] |
Read straight from the file — download or use the API URL for the full dataset.
| p[0] |
| 0.700 |
| valid |
| valid |
| 0.700 |
| valid |
| valid |
| 0.700 |
| valid |
| p[28] |
| 0.700 |
| valid |
| p[28] |
| 0.700 |
| valid |
| 0.700 |
| valid |