| What is the title of the document? | Carbon stock potential of agroforestry systems in low hills of north-western Himalayas | Carbon stock potential of agroforestry systems in low hills of north-western Himalayas
| The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences | 0 | factual | 1.0 | Carbon stock potential of agroforestry systems in low hills of north-western Himalayas
| The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences | Carbon stock potential of agroforestry systems in low hills of north-western Himalayas | | [{"evidence_id":"M000001","location":{"metadata":"title"}}] | 1.0 | valid |
| In which journal is the document published? | The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences | Carbon stock potential of agroforestry systems in low hills of north-western Himalayas
| The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences | 96 | factual | 1.0 | Carbon stock potential of agroforestry systems in low hills of north-western Himalayas
| The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences | The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences | | [{"evidence_id":"M000001","location":{"metadata":"title"}}] | 1.0 | valid |
| Which journal includes the article 'Carbon stock potential of agroforestry systems in low hills of north-western Himalayas'? | The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences | Carbon stock potential of agroforestry systems in low hills of north-western Himalayas
| The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences | 96 | relationship | 1.0 | Carbon stock potential of agroforestry systems in low hills of north-western Himalayas
| The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences | The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences | | [{"evidence_id":"M000001","location":{"metadata":"title"}},{"evidence_id":"B000039","location":{"line":39}}] | 1.0 | valid |
| Where was the study conducted during 2019–21? | The present experiment was conducted at Dr Y S Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry, Nauni, Solan, Himachal Pradesh during 2019–21 | The present experiment was conducted at Dr Y S Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry, Nauni, Solan, Himachal Pradesh during 2019–21 to study the prevalent agroforestry systems and to assess their carbon stock potential. Sub-montane low hill zone of Chamba district of Himachal Pradesh was the study area with 15 farmers selected from each marginal, small and medium categories to carry out the study. Results of the investigation revealed that five agroforestry systems, viz. agrisilviculture, agrihorticulture, agrisilvihorticulture, silvopastoral and pastoralsilviculture were prevalent in the studied area. Maximum aboveground and belowground biomass production was recorded for the silvopastoral system among all the identified systems with least under pastoralsilviculture. Carbon stock potential among all the systems was recorded highest for the silvopastoral system (60.92 Mg/ha) and generally followed the order silvopastoral>agrisilvihorticulture>agrisilviculture>pastoralsilviculture>agrihorticulture. Farmer categories didn’t affect the carbon storage potential of the different agroforestry systems significantly. Soil carbon stock contributed more as compared to vegetation carbon stock with pastoralsilviculture having maximum soil:plant carbon ratio of 2.59. The study highlights the importance of the tree based land uses and offers the basis for selection of the potential |
| What did the study assess in the sub-montane low hill zone of Chamba district, Himachal Pradesh? | to study the prevalent agroforestry systems and to assess their carbon stock potential. Sub-montane low hill zone of Chamba district of Himachal Pradesh was the study area | The present experiment was conducted at Dr Y S Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry, Nauni, Solan, Himachal Pradesh during 2019–21 to study the prevalent agroforestry systems and to assess their carbon stock potential. Sub-montane low hill zone of Chamba district of Himachal Pradesh was the study area with 15 farmers selected from each marginal, small and medium categories to carry out the study. Results of the investigation revealed that five agroforestry systems, viz. agrisilviculture, agrihorticulture, agrisilvihorticulture, silvopastoral and pastoralsilviculture were prevalent in the studied area. Maximum aboveground and belowground biomass production was recorded for the silvopastoral system among all the identified systems with least under pastoralsilviculture. Carbon stock potential among all the systems was recorded highest for the silvopastoral system (60.92 Mg/ha) and generally followed the order silvopastoral>agrisilvihorticulture>agrisilviculture>pastoralsilviculture>agrihorticulture. Farmer categories didn’t affect the carbon storage potential of the different agroforestry systems significantly. Soil carbon stock contributed more as compared to vegetation carbon stock with pastoralsilviculture having maximum soil:plant carbon ratio of 2.59. The study highlights the importance of the tree based land uses and offers the basis for selection of the potential |
| What are the five agroforestry systems identified in the study? | five agroforestry systems, viz. agrisilviculture, agrihorticulture, agrisilvihorticulture, silvopastoral and pastoralsilviculture were prevalent in the studied area | The present experiment was conducted at Dr Y S Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry, Nauni, Solan, Himachal Pradesh during 2019–21 to study the prevalent agroforestry systems and to assess their carbon stock potential. Sub-montane low hill zone of Chamba district of Himachal Pradesh was the study area with 15 farmers selected from each marginal, small and medium categories to carry out the study. Results of the investigation revealed that five agroforestry systems, viz. agrisilviculture, agrihorticulture, agrisilvihorticulture, silvopastoral and pastoralsilviculture were prevalent in the studied area. Maximum aboveground and belowground biomass production was recorded for the silvopastoral system among all the identified systems with least under pastoralsilviculture. Carbon stock potential among all the systems was recorded highest for the silvopastoral system (60.92 Mg/ha) and generally followed the order silvopastoral>agrisilvihorticulture>agrisilviculture>pastoralsilviculture>agrihorticulture. Farmer categories didn’t affect the carbon storage potential of the different agroforestry systems significantly. Soil carbon stock contributed more as compared to vegetation carbon stock with pastoralsilviculture having maximum soil:plant carbon ratio of 2.59. The study highlights the importance of the tree based land uses and offers the basis for selection of the potential |
| Which agroforestry system had the highest soil:plant carbon ratio, and what was the ratio? | Soil carbon stock contributed more as compared to vegetation carbon stock with pastoralsilviculture having maximum soil:plant carbon ratio of 2.59. | ticulture, agrisilvihorticulture, silvopastoral and pastoralsilviculture were prevalent in the studied area. Maximum aboveground and belowground biomass production was recorded for the silvopastoral system among all the identified systems with least under pastoralsilviculture. Carbon stock potential among all the systems was recorded highest for the silvopastoral system (60.92 Mg/ha) and generally followed the order silvopastoral>agrisilvihorticulture>agrisilviculture>pastoralsilviculture>agrihorticulture. Farmer categories didn’t affect the carbon storage potential of the different agroforestry systems significantly. Soil carbon stock contributed more as compared to vegetation carbon stock with pastoralsilviculture having maximum soil:plant carbon ratio of 2.59. The study highlights the importance of the tree based land uses and offers the basis for selection of the potential system from the climate change mitigation point of view in the susceptible Himalayan region. | 626 | factual | 1.0 | Carbon stock potential of agroforestry systems in low hills of north-western Himalayas
| The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences |
| Did farmer categories significantly affect carbon storage potential? | Farmer categories didn’t affect the carbon storage potential of the different agroforestry systems significantly. | gories to carry out the study. Results of the investigation revealed that five agroforestry systems, viz. agrisilviculture, agrihorticulture, agrisilvihorticulture, silvopastoral and pastoralsilviculture were prevalent in the studied area. Maximum aboveground and belowground biomass production was recorded for the silvopastoral system among all the identified systems with least under pastoralsilviculture. Carbon stock potential among all the systems was recorded highest for the silvopastoral system (60.92 Mg/ha) and generally followed the order silvopastoral>agrisilvihorticulture>agrisilviculture>pastoralsilviculture>agrihorticulture. Farmer categories didn’t affect the carbon storage potential of the different agroforestry systems significantly. Soil carbon stock contributed more as compared to vegetation carbon stock with pastoralsilviculture having maximum soil:plant carbon ratio of 2.59. The study highlights the importance of the tree based land uses and offers the basis for selection of the potential system from the climate change mitigation point of view in the susceptible Himalayan region. | 643 | factual | 1.0 | Carbon stock potential of agroforestry systems in low hills of north-western Himalayas
| The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences |
| What does the study emphasize for climate change mitigation in the Himalayan region? | The study highlights the importance of the tree based land uses and offers the basis for selection of the potential system from the climate change mitigation point of view in the susceptible Himalayan region. | or the silvopastoral system among all the identified systems with least under pastoralsilviculture. Carbon stock potential among all the systems was recorded highest for the silvopastoral system (60.92 Mg/ha) and generally followed the order silvopastoral>agrisilvihorticulture>agrisilviculture>pastoralsilviculture>agrihorticulture. Farmer categories didn’t affect the carbon storage potential of the different agroforestry systems significantly. Soil carbon stock contributed more as compared to vegetation carbon stock with pastoralsilviculture having maximum soil:plant carbon ratio of 2.59. The study highlights the importance of the tree based land uses and offers the basis for selection of the potential system from the climate change mitigation point of view in the susceptible Himalayan region. | 596 | factual | 1.0 | Carbon stock potential of agroforestry systems in low hills of north-western Himalayas
| The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences | The study highlights the importance of the tree based land uses and offers the basis for selection of the potential system from the climate change mitigation point of view in the susceptible Himalayan region. |
| What did the IPCC publish in 2003? | IPCC. 2003. Good practice guidance for land use, land-use change and forestry. | IPCC. 2003. Good practice guidance for land use, land-use change and forestry. IPCC National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme, Institute of Global Environmental Strategies, p. 590. Penman J, Gytarsky M, Hiraishi T, Krug T, Kruger D, Pipatti R, Buendia L, Miwa K, Ngara T, Tanabe K and Wagner F. (Eds.). Hayama, Kanagawa, Japan. | 0 | factual | 1.0 | Carbon stock potential of agroforestry systems in low hills of north-western Himalayas
| The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences | IPCC. 2003. Good practice guidance for land use, land-use change and forestry. | | [{"evidence_id":"B000076","location":{"line":77}}] | 1.0 | valid |