41 extractive question-and-answer pairs built from The Executive Director, Karnataka Examinations Authority (KEA), Bengaluru.pdf, published by ugc.gov.in. Every answer is a verbatim span of text the source prints, and each row carries the passage it sits in, its offset in that passage, the source quote, the page and the location in the document, so any row can be checked against the original. 20 of the 41 pairs (48.8%) are explanatory questions and 21 restate a figure. 97.56% of rows pass the corpus quality gate.
Use the API URL with your free DD token in notebooks, scripts, and pipelines.
https://www.desidata.in/api/datasets/updated-guidelines-for-state-eligibility-test-2023-question-and-answer-dataset/downloadDataset downloads are free. For Python or API downloads, sign in once and create a free DD token; set it as DD_TOKEN or save it in your notebook's secrets. Requests are linked to your account so your download history and counts stay accurate.
# One-time install: pip install desidata
# Set DD_TOKEN in your environment first (create a free token in Profile & settings).
import desidata
df = desidata.load("updated-guidelines-for-state-eligibility-test-2023-question-and-answer-dataset")
df.head()Sign in with Google to download.
Usable for analysis, but expect some cleaning before you rely on it.
Vice-Chancellor Handbook - Question and Answer Dataset
Economy · 939 rows
Life Skills (Jeevan Kaushal) 2019 course - Question and Answer Dataset
Economy · 164 rows
MMTTP Guidelines - Question and Answer Dataset
Economy · 85 rows
Learning Outcomes-Based Curriculum Framework - Question and Answer Dataset
Economy · 74 rows
Annual Report 2015-16 by agriwelfare.gov.in - Question and Answer Dataset
Economy · 1,013 rows
Higher Education in India - Question and Answer Dataset
Economy · 1,594 rows
Gender Policy of NABARD - Question and Answer Dataset
Economy · 14 rows
ICAR Annual Report 2025-26 - Question and Answer Dataset
Economy · 1,101 rows
First 10 of 42 rows
| question | answer | context | answer_start | question_type | knowledge_quality_score | source_quote | source_page | source_location | confidence | validation_status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| What is the function of the Steering Committee in the State Eligibility Test? | an overall supervisory policy making body | The other supporting staff may be appointed by the State Government / nodal agency as per requirement. The State Government / SET agency, with the approval of the State Government, shall constitute the following Committees: 5. Steering Committee:- This Committee shall be an overall supervisory policy making body and would lay down policy guidelines and exercise overall supervision on the conduct of the Test and declaration of results. It should ensure that the nature and structure of question papers are in conformity with the pattern of UGC-NET and also ensure that the UGC-NET/Joint CSIR-UGC Test syllabi are followed in totality. It should also approve the centres of examination and other matters pertaining to the conduct of the examination. The Steering Committee shall comprise:- i. Chairman ii. Two Vice-Chancellors of the concerned state universities in rotation iii. | 272 | definition | 1.000 | Steering Committee:- This Committee shall be an overall supervisory policy making body and would lay down policy guidelines and exercise overall supervision on the conduct of the Test and declaration of results. | 3 | page=3,block=1 | 0.700 | valid |
| What determines the subject-wise and category-wise slots for reserved categories? | the reservation policy of the concerned state. | number of slots and qualifying cut-off percentages for all subjects (category-wise) can be determined. The candidates of the reserved categories, who have been included in the Unreserved category for determining the subject-wise cum category-wise slots, are not excluded for determining the subject-wise slots for the reserved categories. This again is subject to the reservation policy of the concerned state. Having determined the subject-wise cum category-wise slots for the reserved categories, the number of slots vacated by candidate(s) of any reserved category qualified as General (Unreserved) candidate(s), is made up for that category by fulfilling the required number of slots by going down the aggregate percentage table in that subject and category. Notes: i) By this method, if the number of slots obtained is less than one but greater than zero however small it may be, it is | 364 | relationship | 0.970 | This again is subject to the reservation policy of the concerned state. Having determined the subject-wise cum category-wise slots for the reserved categories, the number of slots vacated by candidate(s) of any reserved category qualified as General (Unreserved) candidate(s), is made up for that category by fulfilling the required number of slots by going down the aggregate percentage table in that subject and category. | ||||
| What is the goal of the National Eligibility Test (NET)? | to maintain a uniform standard of teaching and research in the country | 1. CONCEPT OF SET In order to maintain a uniform standard of teaching and research in the country, the candidates who, besides fulfilling the minimum academic qualifications prescribed for the post of lecturer, have qualified in a comprehensive test to be specifically conducted for the The University Grants Commission (UGC) held wide-ranging discussions on this issue with groups of senior academicians and educational administrators such as State Education Secretaries etc. in pursuance of the above decision. Accordingly, the concept of National Eligibility Test (NET) was evolved and UGC conducted the first test for Junior Research Fellowship (JRF) and Eligibility for Lectureship (UGC-NET) on 24th December, 1989 in the subjects falling under Humanities and Social Sciences including languages and some science subjects. | 27 | summary | 0.970 | CONCEPT OF SET In order to maintain a uniform standard of teaching and research in the country, the candidates who, besides fulfilling the minimum academic qualifications prescribed for the post of lecturer, have qualified in a comprehensive test to be specifically conducted for the The University Grants Commission (UGC) held wide-ranging discussions on this issue with groups of senior academicians and educational administrators such as State Education Secretaries etc. | ||||
| What option did the UGC give to State Governments and Union Territories regarding eligibility tests for lectureship? | to conduct their own test for eligibility for lectureship on the pattern of NET | Likewise, the Council of Scientific Industrial Research (CSIR) conducted the Joint UGC-CSIR Test for JRF and eligibility for Lectureship on 31st December, 1989 for disciplines falling under the basic sciences. Since then UGC-NET and Joint CSIR-UGC Test have been conducted on a regular basis generally twice every year in the months of June and December. Simultaneously, UGC provided an option to the State Governments and Union Territories to conduct their own test for eligibility for lectureship on the pattern of NET, i.e., the State Level Eligibility Test (SLET), later renamed as State Eligibility Test (SET) for Eligibility for Assistant Professor. | 441 | summary | 0.970 | Simultaneously, UGC provided an option to the State Governments and Union Territories to conduct their own test for eligibility for lectureship on the pattern of NET, i.e., the State Level Eligibility Test (SLET), later renamed as State Eligibility Test (SET) for Eligibility for Assistant Professor. | 2 | page=2,block=2 | 0.700 | |
| What happens to candidates who do not achieve the required marks in the qualifying examination for SET? | they shall be treated as disqualified | ii) result is still awaited or candidates whose qualifying examinations have been delayed may also apply for this test. such candidates will be admitted provisionally and shall be considered eligible for eligibility for Assistant Professor only after they have passed their s Degree or equivalent examination with at least 55% marks (50% marks in case of OBC-NCL/ SC / ST / PwD / Third gender category candidates). Such candidates must SET result with required percentage of marks, failing which they shall be treated as disqualified. iii) Candidates belonging to the Third gender category are eligible to draw the same relaxation in fee, age and Eligibility Criteria for SET (Assistant Professor) as are available to SC/ST/PwD categories. | 496 | summary | 0.970 | Such candidates must SET result with required percentage of marks, failing which they shall be treated as disqualified. | 5 | page=5,block=5 | 0.700 | valid |
| What is the nodal SET agency required to do regarding the notification for SET? | publish the notification for SET on its website and inform the public at large about it through a press release. | ii) However, the following candidates are exempted from appearing in SET in order to apply for the post of Assistant Professor, provided they have fulfilled all the eligibility conditions applicable for that particular test. a) The candidates who have passed the UGC/CSIR examination for Junior Research Fellowship (JRF) prior to December 1989. b) The candidates who have qualified the National Eligibility Test for Lectureship / Assistant Professor (UGC-NET) conducted under the aegis of UGC or qualified the Joint CSIR-UGC Test. 10. PUBLICATION OF NOTIFICATION The nodal SET agency shall publish the notification for SET on its website and inform the public at large about it through a press release. | 590 | summary | 0.970 | PUBLICATION OF NOTIFICATION The nodal SET agency shall publish the notification for SET on its website and inform the public at large about it through a press release. | 6 | page=6,block=5 | 0.700 | valid |
| What is the consequence for a candidate who misbehaves or causes a disturbance during the examination? | will be deemed to have committed misconduct. | They may be Professors or Associate Professors with more than 10 years of teaching experience at postgraduate level. a. PROCESS OF PAPER SETTING Paper setting is to be conducted centrally by a group of experts as per UGC norms at a designated place selected by the nodal SET agency. b. UNFAIR MEANS / MISCONDUCT A) Any candidate who creates disturbance of any kind during the course of examination or otherwise misbehaves in or around the examination centre or refuses to obey the Superintendent, Assistant Superintendent, Invigilator or any other official on examination duty or changes his seat with any other candidate without permission of the invigilator / examination superintendent, will be deemed to have committed misconduct. | 690 | summary | 0.970 | UNFAIR MEANS / MISCONDUCT A) Any candidate who creates disturbance of any kind during the course of examination or otherwise misbehaves in or around the examination centre or refuses to obey the Superintendent, Assistant Superintendent, Invigilator or any other official on examination duty or changes his seat with any other candidate without permission of the invigilator / examination superintendent, will be deemed to have committed misconduct. | ||||
| How are qualified candidates allocated to different categories? | apportioned to different categories as per the reservation policy of the concerned state | THE FORMAT TO FACILITATE THE TASK OF MODERATION COMMITTEE The following basic information / data has to be presented by the SET NODAL agency in addition to other tables, graphs, charts etc. relevant to the analysis before the Moderation Committee for framing the result of SET :- i) Number of Registered Candidates : ii) Number of Appeared Candidates (Who appeared in all papers) : iii) Number of Candidates to be Qualified : (6% of Appeared Candidates) The number of qualified candidates apportioned to different categories as per the reservation policy of the concerned state. | 489 | summary | 0.970 | relevant to the analysis before the Moderation Committee for framing the result of SET :- i) Number of Registered Candidates : ii) Number of Appeared Candidates (Who appeared in all papers) : iii) Number of Candidates to be Qualified : (6% of Appeared Candidates) The number of qualified candidates apportioned to different categories as per the reservation policy of the concerned state. | 9 | page=9,block=3 | 0.700 | valid |
| How are candidates with 40% or more marks in aggregate treated in the unreserved category? | shall be treated as belonging to General (unreserved category) irrespective of their actual category | The candidates, who have appeared in all papers, securing 40% or more marks in aggregate, shall be treated as belonging to General (unreserved category) irrespective of their actual category for determining the subject-wise slots for the General (Unreserved) category. This shall be subject to the state reservation policy in this respect. No. of General (UR) candidates who have secured 40% or more marks in aggregate in that subject No. of Slots in a subject = ----------------------------------------- X Total No. of slots for General (Unreserved) Total No. of General (UR) available under Candidates Candidates who have General (UR) category Secured 40% or more marks in aggregate over all subjects The aggregate percentage corresponding to this slot is the qualifying cut-off percentage in the concerned subject for the unreserved category. | 90 | summary | 0.970 | The candidates, who have appeared in all papers, securing 40% or more marks in aggregate, shall be treated as belonging to General (unreserved category) irrespective of their actual category for determining the subject-wise slots for the General (Unreserved) category. | ||||
| What happens to the slots vacated by reserved category candidates who qualify as General candidates? | is made up for that category by fulfilling the required number of slots by going down the aggregate percentage table in that subject and category. | number of slots and qualifying cut-off percentages for all subjects (category-wise) can be determined. The candidates of the reserved categories, who have been included in the Unreserved category for determining the subject-wise cum category-wise slots, are not excluded for determining the subject-wise slots for the reserved categories. This again is subject to the reservation policy of the concerned state. Having determined the subject-wise cum category-wise slots for the reserved categories, the number of slots vacated by candidate(s) of any reserved category qualified as General (Unreserved) candidate(s), is made up for that category by fulfilling the required number of slots by going down the aggregate percentage table in that subject and category. Notes: i) By this method, if the number of slots obtained is less than one but greater than zero however small it may be, it is | 616 | summary | 0.970 | Having determined the subject-wise cum category-wise slots for the reserved categories, the number of slots vacated by candidate(s) of any reserved category qualified as General (Unreserved) candidate(s), is made up for that category by fulfilling the required number of slots by going down the aggregate percentage table in that subject and category. Notes: i) By this method, if the number of slots obtained is less than one but greater than zero however small it may be, it is |
Read straight from the file — download or use the API URL for the full dataset.
| 10 |
| page=10,block=2 |
| 0.700 |
| valid |
| 2 |
| page=2,block=2 |
| 0.700 |
| valid |
| valid |
| 6 |
| page=6,block=13 |
| 0.700 |
| valid |
| 10 |
| page=10,block=2 |
| 0.700 |
| valid |
| 10 |
| page=10,block=2 |
| 0.700 |
| valid |