13 extractive question-and-answer pairs built from Microsoft Word - Simplification, published by agriwelfare.gov.in. Every answer is a verbatim span of text the source prints, and each row carries the passage it sits in, its offset in that passage, the source quote, the page and the location in the document, so any row can be checked against the original. 8 of the 13 pairs (61.5%) are explanatory questions and 5 restate a figure. 100.00% of rows pass the corpus quality gate.
Use the API URL with your free DD token in notebooks, scripts, and pipelines.
https://www.desidata.in/api/datasets/simplification-of-fertiliser-control-order-requirements-question-and-answer/downloadDataset downloads are free. For Python or API downloads, sign in once and create a free DD token; set it as DD_TOKEN or save it in your notebook's secrets. Requests are linked to your account so your download history and counts stay accurate.
# One-time install: pip install desidata
# Set DD_TOKEN in your environment first (create a free token in Profile & settings).
import desidata
df = desidata.load("simplification-of-fertiliser-control-order-requirements-question-and-answer")
df.head()Sign in with Google to download.
Usable for analysis, but expect some cleaning before you rely on it.
Annual Report 2015-16 by agriwelfare.gov.in - Question and Answer Dataset
Economy · 1,013 rows
Annual Report 2019-20 by agriwelfare.gov.in - Question and Answer Dataset
Economy · 869 rows
Annual Report 2017-18 by agriwelfare.gov.in - Question and Answer Dataset
Economy · 808 rows
Department of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare Annual Report 2025-26 - Question and Answer Dataset
Economy · 53 rows
Annual Report 2015-16 by agriwelfare.gov.in - Question and Answer Dataset
Economy · 1,013 rows
Higher Education in India - Question and Answer Dataset
Economy · 1,594 rows
Gender Policy of NABARD - Question and Answer Dataset
Economy · 14 rows
ICAR Annual Report 2025-26 - Question and Answer Dataset
Economy · 1,101 rows
First 10 of 13 rows
| question | answer | context | answer_start | question_type | knowledge_quality_score | source_quote | source_page | source_location | confidence | validation_status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| What is required if the nutrient source in a proposed fertilizer differs from one already included in the FCO? | it would be required to be tested under field conditions for one cropping season | It has now been decided to adopt the following procedure to reduce the time taken in inclusion of fertilizers in FCO: (i) At present multi locational trial data are required to be generated for two cropping seasons on different crops in different agro-climatic regions to evaluate a particular product in terms of its agronomic efficiency, cost benefit ratio and other criteria. It has been decided that in case the source of nutrient in a particular product proposed to be used as fertilizer and to be included in FCO is different from the one already included in FCO, it would be required to be tested under field conditions for one cropping season. In case the results are inconclusive in one cropping season, the trials may be extended for another cropping season. | 570 | relationship | 0.970 | It has been decided that in case the source of nutrient in a particular product proposed to be used as fertilizer and to be included in FCO is different from the one already included in FCO, it would be required to be tested under field conditions for one cropping season. | 1 | page=1,block=1 | 0.700 | valid |
| Why is soil application of iron and manganese not desirable? | due to low nutrient use efficiency | (Note: Usually, soil application of iron and manganese is not desirable due to low nutrient use efficiency. Hence fortification is not advocated as high doses are required. For foliar application, sulphate salts of iron and manganese @ 0.5 – 1.0% are recommended) (J.C. Bain) Deputy Secretary (INM) | 72 | relationship | 0.970 | (Note: Usually, soil application of iron and manganese is not desirable due to low nutrient use efficiency. | 2 | page=2,block=0 | 0.700 | valid |
| What happens if the source of nutrient in a proposed fertilizer differs from one already included in the Fertiliser (Control) Order? | it would be required to be tested under field conditions for one cropping season | It has now been decided to adopt the following procedure to reduce the time taken in inclusion of fertilizers in FCO: (i) At present multi locational trial data are required to be generated for two cropping seasons on different crops in different agro-climatic regions to evaluate a particular product in terms of its agronomic efficiency, cost benefit ratio and other criteria. It has been decided that in case the source of nutrient in a particular product proposed to be used as fertilizer and to be included in FCO is different from the one already included in FCO, it would be required to be tested under field conditions for one cropping season. In case the results are inconclusive in one cropping season, the trials may be extended for another cropping season. | 570 | relationship | 0.970 | It has been decided that in case the source of nutrient in a particular product proposed to be used as fertilizer and to be included in FCO is different from the one already included in FCO, it would be required to be tested under field conditions for one cropping season. | 1 | |||
| What happens if the source of nutrient in a product is different from one already included in FCO? | it would be required to be tested under field conditions for one cropping season | It has now been decided to adopt the following procedure to reduce the time taken in inclusion of fertilizers in FCO: (i) At present multi locational trial data are required to be generated for two cropping seasons on different crops in different agro-climatic regions to evaluate a particular product in terms of its agronomic efficiency, cost benefit ratio and other criteria. It has been decided that in case the source of nutrient in a particular product proposed to be used as fertilizer and to be included in FCO is different from the one already included in FCO, it would be required to be tested under field conditions for one cropping season. In case the results are inconclusive in one cropping season, the trials may be extended for another cropping season. | 570 | relationship | 0.970 | It has been decided that in case the source of nutrient in a particular product proposed to be used as fertilizer and to be included in FCO is different from the one already included in FCO, it would be required to be tested under field conditions for one cropping season. | 1 | page=1,block=1 | ||
| What happens if the nutrient source in a product proposed for inclusion in FCO differs from an already included source? | it would be required to be tested under field conditions for one cropping season | It has now been decided to adopt the following procedure to reduce the time taken in inclusion of fertilizers in FCO: (i) At present multi locational trial data are required to be generated for two cropping seasons on different crops in different agro-climatic regions to evaluate a particular product in terms of its agronomic efficiency, cost benefit ratio and other criteria. It has been decided that in case the source of nutrient in a particular product proposed to be used as fertilizer and to be included in FCO is different from the one already included in FCO, it would be required to be tested under field conditions for one cropping season. In case the results are inconclusive in one cropping season, the trials may be extended for another cropping season. | 570 | relationship | 0.970 | It has been decided that in case the source of nutrient in a particular product proposed to be used as fertilizer and to be included in FCO is different from the one already included in FCO, it would be required to be tested under field conditions for one cropping season. | 1 | |||
| Why is soil application of iron and manganese usually considered undesirable? | low nutrient use efficiency | (Note: Usually, soil application of iron and manganese is not desirable due to low nutrient use efficiency. Hence fortification is not advocated as high doses are required. | 79 | relationship | 0.890 | (Note: Usually, soil application of iron and manganese is not desirable due to low nutrient use efficiency. | 2 | page=2,block=0 | 0.800 | valid |
| What has the government been considering regarding the inclusion of fertilizers in Schedule I and under Clause 20 A? | simplification of the procedure | New Delhi, Krishi Bhavan Dated the 15th December,2009 TO 1.The Secretary (Agriculture) State Government of 2. All Fertilizers Manufacturers Subject:- Simplification of Procedure for Inclusion of fertilizers in FCO. Sir, I am directed to state that inclusion of any product as fertilizer in Schedule I, or as provisional fertilizer under Clause 20 A, or as customized fertilizer under Clause 20B, of the Fertiliser (Control) Order (FCO),1985 inter alia requires data on agronomic trials. 2. The issue of simplification of the procedure for inclusion of fertilizers in Schedule I and under Clause 20 A has been under the consideration of the Government for some time. | 503 | summary | 0.890 | The issue of simplification of the procedure for inclusion of fertilizers in Schedule I and under Clause 20 A has been under the consideration of the Government for some time. | 1 | page=1,block=1 | 0.700 | valid |
| Which clauses of the Fertiliser (Control) Order are mentioned regarding the inclusion of fertilizers? | Clause 20 A, or as customized fertilizer under Clause 20B | New Delhi, Krishi Bhavan Dated the 15th December,2009 TO 1.The Secretary (Agriculture) State Government of 2. All Fertilizers Manufacturers Subject:- Simplification of Procedure for Inclusion of fertilizers in FCO. Sir, I am directed to state that inclusion of any product as fertilizer in Schedule I, or as provisional fertilizer under Clause 20 A, or as customized fertilizer under Clause 20B, of the Fertiliser (Control) Order (FCO),1985 inter alia requires data on agronomic trials. 2. The issue of simplification of the procedure for inclusion of fertilizers in Schedule I and under Clause 20 A has been under the consideration of the Government for some time. | 337 | list | 0.820 | Sir, I am directed to state that inclusion of any product as fertilizer in Schedule I, or as provisional fertilizer under Clause 20 A, or as customized fertilizer under Clause 20B, of the Fertiliser (Control) Order (FCO),1985 inter alia requires data on agronomic trials. | 1 | page=1,block=1 | 0.700 | valid |
| What data is currently required to assess a product's agronomic efficiency and cost-benefit ratio? | multi locational trial data are required to be generated for two cropping seasons on different crops in different agro-climatic regions | It has now been decided to adopt the following procedure to reduce the time taken in inclusion of fertilizers in FCO: (i) At present multi locational trial data are required to be generated for two cropping seasons on different crops in different agro-climatic regions to evaluate a particular product in terms of its agronomic efficiency, cost benefit ratio and other criteria. It has been decided that in case the source of nutrient in a particular product proposed to be used as fertilizer and to be included in FCO is different from the one already included in FCO, it would be required to be tested under field conditions for one cropping season. In case the results are inconclusive in one cropping season, the trials may be extended for another cropping season. | 133 | factual | 0.570 | It has now been decided to adopt the following procedure to reduce the time taken in inclusion of fertilizers in FCO: (i) At present multi locational trial data are required to be generated for two cropping seasons on different crops in different agro-climatic regions to evaluate a particular product in terms of its agronomic efficiency, cost benefit ratio and other criteria. | ||||
| What is the procedure if trial results from one cropping season are inconclusive? | the trials may be extended for another cropping season | It has now been decided to adopt the following procedure to reduce the time taken in inclusion of fertilizers in FCO: (i) At present multi locational trial data are required to be generated for two cropping seasons on different crops in different agro-climatic regions to evaluate a particular product in terms of its agronomic efficiency, cost benefit ratio and other criteria. It has been decided that in case the source of nutrient in a particular product proposed to be used as fertilizer and to be included in FCO is different from the one already included in FCO, it would be required to be tested under field conditions for one cropping season. In case the results are inconclusive in one cropping season, the trials may be extended for another cropping season. | 713 | factual | 0.570 | In case the results are inconclusive in one cropping season, the trials may be extended for another cropping season. | 1 | page=1,block=1 | 0.700 | valid |
Read straight from the file — download or use the API URL for the full dataset.
| page=1,block=1 |
| 0.700 |
| valid |
| 0.700 |
| valid |
| page=1,block=1 |
| 0.700 |
| valid |
| 1 |
| page=1,block=1 |
| 0.700 |
| valid |