| What does the term 'Towns' include according to columns 4 and 7? | Municipalities (i.e., areas under United Prov41Q_es Act II of 1916) | III-Intra-provincial factors whioh do not affect the total provincial area.-In addi- tion to the small changes in boundaries referred to in II{b) above, the following more important changes were made in di.strict boundaries in 1925, when, as a measure of economy, certain t&hsils were abolished and added to other tab- sils. , The changes in district areas on this account are as follows :- (a) 40 square miles were transferred from district Farrukhabad to district Shah- jahanpur. . (b) 147 square miles were tra'1l!ferred from district Banda to district Hamirpur. (c) 90 square miles were transferred from district Ghazipur to district Benares. These transfers did not, of course, affect the total area of the province. 2. In columns 4 and 7 " Towns" include as separate units-- (a) Municipalities (i.e., areas under United Prov41Q_es Act II of 1916). | 785 | definition | 1.000 | https://censusindia.gov.in/nada/index.php/catalog/32516/download/35697/30675_1931_IMP.pdf | In columns 4 and 7 " Towns" include as separate units-- (a) Municipalities (i.e., areas under United Prov41Q_es Act II of 1916). | 7 | page=7,block=1 | 0.700 | valid |
| What does the term 'widowed' include in the context of civil conditions? | Divorced (and not remarried) persons are included under" widowed" | Age, Sex and Civil Condition by Religion. 1. The figures are shown in three parts- A-Provincial Totalg-For British Territory nnel HtntcR sepnmtply, for all rf'ligions together and severally, hy annual Ilge periOlIR f!'Olll 0--5 nl1(l hy quinquon- nial periods from 5-70. B-Dlstrict and State 'figures for (1) all religion!! together, (2) Brahmanic Hindus and (3) Muslims, b.y the above age periods as far as 20 Ilnd thereafter by decennial periods up to 60. G-City figures, arranged as in B. Civil conditions are shown separately throughout. "' Divorced (and not remarried) persons are included under" widowed" 2. The age groups have been smoothed in accordance with inRtrnctions issued by the Government of India. 3. Three males who returned indefinite beliefs (see note 1 to Table XVI) have hC'en included in this Table und~r Christians. 4. | 545 | definition | 1.000 | https://censusindia.gov.in/nada/index.php/catalog/32516/download/35697/30675_1931_IMP.pdf | "' Divorced (and not remarried) persons are included under" widowed" 2. | 117 | page=117,block=1 |
| What change occurred to the Ranibagh-Kathgodam Notified Area since the last census? | has been amalga- mated since last census with, the Haldward Notified Area, causing a further reduction of one town. | 14) Nos. 1-11, 16, 25' and 26 have ceased to be under Act II of 1914 since last cenSU8, and have no urban characteristics. Nos. 12-15 have never been under that Act and consist in e'ach case of many rural hamlets scattered over a large area. Nos. 17-24 were wrongly shown under Act II of 1914 at last census. They are not under the Act now and have no urban characteristics. Nos. 27 and 28 are not under thc Act and are but villages. (2) The Ranibagh-Kathgodam Notified Area in district Naini Tal has been amalga- mated since last census with, the Haldward Notified Area, causing a further reduction of one town. f (3) The following 12 towns (which have been printed in italics in both t,his and Table V, Part B) have been inoluded now for the first time. Serial Town. District. Serial Town. District. number. ~umber. I Sisauli .. .. Muzaffarnagar. 7 Bhusawal .. ~ I Gorakhpnr. 2 Bugrasi .. .. | 497 | relationship | 0.970 | https://censusindia.gov.in/nada/index.php/catalog/32516/download/35697/30675_1931_IMP.pdf | (2) The Ranibagh-Kathgodam Notified Area in district Naini Tal has been amalga- mated since last census with, the Haldward Notified Area, causing a further reduction of one town. f (3) The following 12 towns (which have been printed in italics in both t,his and Table V, Part B) have been inoluded now for the first time. |
| What issue affected the distinction between urban and sub-urban populations in municipalities of 20,000 or more? | District Census Officers did not always give this matter their careful attention ,with the result that in some cases figures are lacking. | Actually the 23 cities and 405 towns of the present table are exactly equivalent to the 450 towns of those tables and the total populations will be found to agree. 5. In the case of those municipalities of which the population was 20,000 or over at last census, an attempt has been'made to distinguish between the purel;¥-urban and the sub-urban populations. District Census Officers did not always give this matter their careful attention ,with the result that in some cases figures are lacking. 6. Prior to 1911 the figures of cantonments and....Dotified areas were invariably included with those of' adjacent municipalities. '1. In this table at last census the total number of cities and towns shown was 446. Tile following changes have been made this time. \, I (1) The following 28 'places have now been excluded :- | 359 | relationship | 0.970 | https://censusindia.gov.in/nada/index.php/catalog/32516/download/35697/30675_1931_IMP.pdf | In the case of those municipalities of which the population was 20,000 or over at last census, an attempt has been'made to distinguish between the purel;¥-urban and the sub-urban populations. District Census Officers did not always give this matter their careful attention ,with the result that in some cases figures are lacking. 6. |
| Why do the United Provinces totals for these years exceed the town-wise totals? | by the figures of the 28 towns which have beon . omitted at this census | Tho differences are due to :- (1) certain towns tJ.8.ving passed from one class to another since last census, ann I (2) the exclusio.t;l of the 28 Ulwns refeJ.'red to ill the previous paragraph. In the United Provinoes totals for these years the first faotor oanoels itself and the figures will be' found to exoeed the town wise totals by the figures of the 28 towns which have beon . omitted at this census. Their {igurils for 1921 and previous years have been left in the totals beoause although they no longer form part of the urban area, they did at previous censuses. 9. In the same way, the figures of previous censuses of the 12 ·towns inoluded for the first time at this census are not included in the figures of 1921 and previous years, bocause at that time they did not form part of the urban area. | 336 | relationship | 0.970 | https://censusindia.gov.in/nada/index.php/catalog/32516/download/35697/30675_1931_IMP.pdf | In the United Provinoes totals for these years the first faotor oanoels itself and the figures will be' found to exoeed the town wise totals by the figures of the 28 towns which have beon . omitted at this census. |
| Why do the total population figures of the United Provinces differ between this volume and the all-India Tables volume? | the total. roferred to have been adjusted retrospectively on account of \his ex·India transfer | Adjustments have been made for transfers between the following districta whicl. do not, however, affect the provincial totals :=-- Muzaffarnagar, Meerut, Etah, Bijnor, Budaun, Moradabad, Shahjahanpur, Far- rukhabad, Hamirpur, Banda, Benares, Ghazipur, Gonda and Bam Banki. *The slight differences between the total population figures of the United Provinces for 1881-1921 as IItated in this volUl!1o e.nd as shown in the all.India Tables volume are dut'> to the fact that in this volume the total. roferred to have been adjusted retrospectively on account of \his ex·India transfer. | 487 | relationship | 0.970 | https://censusindia.gov.in/nada/index.php/catalog/32516/download/35697/30675_1931_IMP.pdf | *The slight differences between the total population figures of the United Provinces for 1881-1921 as IItated in this volUl!1o e.nd as shown in the all.India Tables volume are dut'> to the fact that in this volume the total. roferred to have been adjusted retrospectively on account of \his ex·India transfer. | 11 |
| Why have towns 2, 6, and 7 been treated as towns despite not being under Act II of 1914? | in view of their population and urban characteristics | Bulandshahr. 8 Nautanwan ., 3 Puranpur .. .. Pilibhit. 9 Amila .. . . Azamgarh. - 4 Khaga .. .. Fatchpur. 10 Nimsar .. .. Sitapur. 5 Robert.ganj .. Mirzapur. ·11 Oel .. . . ~ Khcri • 6 Bar" .. .. Ghazipllr. 12 Palin .. . . I . Nos. I, 3-5, and 8-12 have been brought under Act II of 1914 since last census. Nos. 2, 6 and 7 are not under that Act but have been treated as towns in view of their population and urban characteristics. I 8. The figures shown against the United Provinces aJ;ld the six class totals for 1921 and previous years have not been adjusted in any way on account of the change in the list of towns since last census, though certain errors- discovered in tho figures printed at iast census have been eliminated. Consequently the townwise figures for these years do not add up to the class totals. | 377 | relationship | 0.970 | https://censusindia.gov.in/nada/index.php/catalog/32516/download/35697/30675_1931_IMP.pdf | 2, 6 and 7 are not under that Act but have been treated as towns in view of their population and urban characteristics. | 20 | page=20,block=0 |
| Why was the population of the Gorakhpur Railway Colony excluded from the city figures? | They were excluded in error in the Cent,ral Office ancl it WI1,S not con::;i- dered worth the expense to abstract them subsequently | The city figures for Gorakhpur in part C exclude the population of the Gornkhpur Railway Colony. They were excluded in error in the Cent,ral Office ancl it WI1,S not con::;i- dered worth the expense to abstract them subsequently. | 97 | relationship | 0.970 | https://censusindia.gov.in/nada/index.php/catalog/32516/download/35697/30675_1931_IMP.pdf | The city figures for Gorakhpur in part C exclude the population of the Gornkhpur Railway Colony. They were excluded in error in the Cent,ral Office ancl it WI1,S not con::;i- dered worth the expense to abstract them subsequently. | 117 | page=117,block=1 | 0.700 | valid |
| How are district and state figures presented for Brahmanic Hindus and Muslims? | b.y the above age periods as far as 20 Ilnd thereafter by decennial periods up to 60 | Age, Sex and Civil Condition by Religion. 1. The figures are shown in three parts- A-Provincial Totalg-For British Territory nnel HtntcR sepnmtply, for all rf'ligions together and severally, hy annual Ilge periOlIR f!'Olll 0--5 nl1(l hy quinquon- nial periods from 5-70. B-Dlstrict and State 'figures for (1) all religion!! together, (2) Brahmanic Hindus and (3) Muslims, b.y the above age periods as far as 20 Ilnd thereafter by decennial periods up to 60. G-City figures, arranged as in B. Civil conditions are shown separately throughout. "' Divorced (and not remarried) persons are included under" widowed" 2. The age groups have been smoothed in accordance with inRtrnctions issued by the Government of India. 3. Three males who returned indefinite beliefs (see note 1 to Table XVI) have hC'en included in this Table und~r Christians. 4. | 372 | summary | 0.970 | https://censusindia.gov.in/nada/index.php/catalog/32516/download/35697/30675_1931_IMP.pdf | B-Dlstrict and State 'figures for (1) all religion!! together, (2) Brahmanic Hindus and (3) Muslims, b.y the above age periods as far as 20 Ilnd thereafter by decennial periods up to 60. |
| What caused an increase of 9 square miles in the province's area? | resurvey in some districts preparatory to resettlement, and in others on account 'bf small changes of boundaries due to fluvial action | II-Intra-provincial factors affecting total area of the province. (a) It appears that the areas of districts Bulandshahr, Agra, Bijnor, Etawah, Allahabad, Jhansi, Ballia, Basti, Sitapur, ,Kheri and Gonda, and of Rampur State were incorrectly shown at . last census. The net result was that the area. of the province was then shown too much by f)4 square miles. (b) On account of resurvey in some districts preparatory to resettlement, and in others on account 'bf small changes of boundaries due to fluvial action an increase altogether of 9 square miles has occurred. , The districts concerned ar~ :- Muzaftarnagar, Meerut, Aligarh, Etah, Bijnor, Budaun, Moradabad, Pilibhit, Hamirpur, B9'nda, Ballia, Gorakhpur, B&ati, Azamgarh, Rae Bareli, Sitapur, Hardoi, Kheri, 1!yzabad, Gonda, Sultanpur, Partabgarh and Bara Banki. . | 379 | summary | 0.970 | https://censusindia.gov.in/nada/index.php/catalog/32516/download/35697/30675_1931_IMP.pdf | (b) On account of resurvey in some districts preparatory to resettlement, and in others on account 'bf small changes of boundaries due to fluvial action an increase altogether of 9 square miles has occurred. |