15 extractive question-and-answer pairs built from Provisionally Selected Application Under RPS 2025 Scheme, published by aicte.gov.in. Every answer is a verbatim span of text the source prints, and each row carries the passage it sits in, its offset in that passage, the source quote, the page and the location in the document, so any row can be checked against the original. 11 of the 15 pairs (73.3%) are explanatory questions and 4 restate a figure. 100.00% of rows pass the corpus quality gate.
Use the API URL with your free DD token in notebooks, scripts, and pipelines.
https://www.desidata.in/api/datasets/aicte-research-promotion-scheme-lab-to-market-2025-question-and-answer-dataset/downloadDataset downloads are free. For Python or API downloads, sign in once and create a free DD token; set it as DD_TOKEN or save it in your notebook's secrets. Requests are linked to your account so your download history and counts stay accurate.
# One-time install: pip install desidata
# Set DD_TOKEN in your environment first (create a free token in Profile & settings).
import desidata
df = desidata.load("aicte-research-promotion-scheme-lab-to-market-2025-question-and-answer-dataset")
df.head()Sign in with Google to download.
Usable for analysis, but expect some cleaning before you rely on it.
Green Energy Skill Capacity Building Framework - Question and Answer Dataset
Economy · 582 rows
Vaani 2026-27 Result - Question and Answer Dataset
Economy · 12 rows
AICTE Inputs on Artificial Intelligence - Question and Answer Dataset
Economy · 8 rows
Offline 2026-27 ATAL Faculty Development Programs - Question and Answer Dataset
Economy · 469 rows
Annual Report 2015-16 by agriwelfare.gov.in - Question and Answer Dataset
Economy · 1,013 rows
Higher Education in India - Question and Answer Dataset
Economy · 1,594 rows
Gender Policy of NABARD - Question and Answer Dataset
Economy · 14 rows
ICAR Annual Report 2025-26 - Question and Answer Dataset
Economy · 1,101 rows
First 10 of 15 rows
| question | answer | context | answer_start | question_type | knowledge_quality_score | source_quote | source_page | source_location | confidence | validation_status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| What is the purpose of the AICTE Research Promotion Scheme (RPS)? | to foster innovation and research in AICTE approved institutions by providing research grant up to 25 lakhs | All India Council for Technical Education Research Promotion Scheme (RPS) 2025: Lab to Market The AICTE Research Promotion Scheme (RPS) was initiated in 2003-04 to foster innovation and research in AICTE approved institutions by providing research grant up to 25 lakhs. This scheme has been restructured as “AICTE RPS: Lab to Market” in the year 2025 with an aim to establish an ecosystem that supports translational research at least having technology readiness level (TRL) level 6/7. AICTE provides support for taking this work to market and / or industrial applications. The maximum grant to be given to a proposal is increased up to Rs 50 lakhs. | 161 | definition | 1.000 | All India Council for Technical Education Research Promotion Scheme (RPS) 2025: Lab to Market The AICTE Research Promotion Scheme (RPS) was initiated in 2003-04 to foster innovation and research in AICTE approved institutions by providing research grant up to 25 lakhs. | 1 | page=1,block=0 | 0.700 | valid |
| What is the aim of the restructured AICTE RPS: Lab to Market? | to establish an ecosystem that supports translational research at least having technology readiness level (TRL) level 6/7 | All India Council for Technical Education Research Promotion Scheme (RPS) 2025: Lab to Market The AICTE Research Promotion Scheme (RPS) was initiated in 2003-04 to foster innovation and research in AICTE approved institutions by providing research grant up to 25 lakhs. This scheme has been restructured as “AICTE RPS: Lab to Market” in the year 2025 with an aim to establish an ecosystem that supports translational research at least having technology readiness level (TRL) level 6/7. AICTE provides support for taking this work to market and / or industrial applications. The maximum grant to be given to a proposal is increased up to Rs 50 lakhs. | 363 | definition | 1.000 | This scheme has been restructured as “AICTE RPS: Lab to Market” in the year 2025 with an aim to establish an ecosystem that supports translational research at least having technology readiness level (TRL) level 6/7. | 1 | page=1,block=0 | 0.700 | valid |
| What were experts expected to provide during the Phase II Evaluation? | a clear recommendation along with an indicative funding amount | Phase II Evaluation was held during 14th January, 2026 to 7th February. Experts scored each proposal on multiple parameters and were expected to provide a clear recommendation along with an indicative funding amount Out of 815 evaluated proposals, based on the recommendation of committee and subsequent approval of competent authority following proposal of 240 were recommended for release of grant. S.No RPS Application ID 1 RPS-1-3683696591-2025-8402 2 RPS-1-262262952-2025-3909 3 RPS-1-837103261-2025-7484 4 RPS-1-3371646341-2025-4139 5 RPS-1-3968343-2025-7289 6 RPS-1-21569051-2025-8987 7 RPS-1-515991181-2025-2308 8 RPS-1-833641561-2025-6969 9 RPS-1-13439501-2025-7096 | 153 | definition | 1.000 | Experts scored each proposal on multiple parameters and were expected to provide a clear recommendation along with an indicative funding amount Out of 815 evaluated proposals, based on the recommendation of committee and subsequent approval of competent authority following proposal of 240 were recommended for release of grant. | 1 | page=1,block=5 | 0.700 | valid |
| What is the primary objective of the AICTE Research Promotion Scheme (RPS) initiated in 2003-04? | to foster innovation and research in AICTE approved institutions by providing research grant up to 25 lakhs | All India Council for Technical Education Research Promotion Scheme (RPS) 2025: Lab to Market The AICTE Research Promotion Scheme (RPS) was initiated in 2003-04 to foster innovation and research in AICTE approved institutions by providing research grant up to 25 lakhs. This scheme has been restructured as “AICTE RPS: Lab to Market” in the year 2025 with an aim to establish an ecosystem that supports translational research at least having technology readiness level (TRL) level 6/7. AICTE provides support for taking this work to market and / or industrial applications. The maximum grant to be given to a proposal is increased up to Rs 50 lakhs. | 161 | definition | 1.000 | All India Council for Technical Education Research Promotion Scheme (RPS) 2025: Lab to Market The AICTE Research Promotion Scheme (RPS) was initiated in 2003-04 to foster innovation and research in AICTE approved institutions by providing research grant up to 25 lakhs. | 1 | page=1,block=0 | 0.700 | valid |
| What is the goal of the AICTE RPS: Lab to Market scheme introduced in 2025? | to establish an ecosystem that supports translational research at least having technology readiness level (TRL) level 6/7 | All India Council for Technical Education Research Promotion Scheme (RPS) 2025: Lab to Market The AICTE Research Promotion Scheme (RPS) was initiated in 2003-04 to foster innovation and research in AICTE approved institutions by providing research grant up to 25 lakhs. This scheme has been restructured as “AICTE RPS: Lab to Market” in the year 2025 with an aim to establish an ecosystem that supports translational research at least having technology readiness level (TRL) level 6/7. AICTE provides support for taking this work to market and / or industrial applications. The maximum grant to be given to a proposal is increased up to Rs 50 lakhs. | 363 | summary | 0.970 | This scheme has been restructured as “AICTE RPS: Lab to Market” in the year 2025 with an aim to establish an ecosystem that supports translational research at least having technology readiness level (TRL) level 6/7. | 1 | page=1,block=0 | 0.700 | valid |
| How were proposals evaluated in Phase I of the RPS Lab to Market scheme? | each proposal was assigned independently to three domain experts for evaluation via RPS Portal | The evaluation of these proposals were conducted in two Phases: Phase I (screening) and Phase II (recommendation for grant) for selection of the best proposal, which are aligned with RPS lab to market vision. Phase I Evaluation: Based on research domain, each proposal was assigned independently to three domain experts for evaluation via RPS Portal. The independent review model ensured that evaluations were unbiased and rooted in academic merit. Proposals receiving at least two positive recommendations—either acceptance or acceptance with modifications—were shortlisted, for the second phase total 815 proposals were shortlisted. Phase II Evaluation: It was decided to evaluate the proposal by the committee comprise of renowned academic and Industry experts. During evaluation the applicant was present online and made presentation before the expert committee. | 255 | summary | 0.970 | Phase I Evaluation: Based on research domain, each proposal was assigned independently to three domain experts for evaluation via RPS Portal. | 1 | page=1,block=5 | 0.700 | |
| What was the role of experts during Phase II Evaluation of the RPS Lab to Market proposals? | scored each proposal on multiple parameters and were expected to provide a clear recommendation along with an indicative funding amount | Phase II Evaluation was held during 14th January, 2026 to 7th February. Experts scored each proposal on multiple parameters and were expected to provide a clear recommendation along with an indicative funding amount Out of 815 evaluated proposals, based on the recommendation of committee and subsequent approval of competent authority following proposal of 240 were recommended for release of grant. S.No RPS Application ID 1 RPS-1-3683696591-2025-8402 2 RPS-1-262262952-2025-3909 3 RPS-1-837103261-2025-7484 4 RPS-1-3371646341-2025-4139 5 RPS-1-3968343-2025-7289 6 RPS-1-21569051-2025-8987 7 RPS-1-515991181-2025-2308 8 RPS-1-833641561-2025-6969 9 RPS-1-13439501-2025-7096 | 80 | summary | 0.970 | Experts scored each proposal on multiple parameters and were expected to provide a clear recommendation along with an indicative funding amount Out of 815 evaluated proposals, based on the recommendation of committee and subsequent approval of competent authority following proposal of 240 were recommended for release of grant. | 1 | page=1,block=5 | ||
| What ensured that the evaluations in Phase I were unbiased? | The independent review model | The evaluation of these proposals were conducted in two Phases: Phase I (screening) and Phase II (recommendation for grant) for selection of the best proposal, which are aligned with RPS lab to market vision. Phase I Evaluation: Based on research domain, each proposal was assigned independently to three domain experts for evaluation via RPS Portal. The independent review model ensured that evaluations were unbiased and rooted in academic merit. Proposals receiving at least two positive recommendations—either acceptance or acceptance with modifications—were shortlisted, for the second phase total 815 proposals were shortlisted. Phase II Evaluation: It was decided to evaluate the proposal by the committee comprise of renowned academic and Industry experts. During evaluation the applicant was present online and made presentation before the expert committee. | 351 | definition | 0.940 | Phase I Evaluation: Based on research domain, each proposal was assigned independently to three domain experts for evaluation via RPS Portal. The independent review model ensured that evaluations were unbiased and rooted in academic merit. | 1 | page=1,block=5 | ||
| What was the purpose of Phase I evaluation in the RPS proposal process? | screening | The evaluation of these proposals were conducted in two Phases: Phase I (screening) and Phase II (recommendation for grant) for selection of the best proposal, which are aligned with RPS lab to market vision. Phase I Evaluation: Based on research domain, each proposal was assigned independently to three domain experts for evaluation via RPS Portal. The independent review model ensured that evaluations were unbiased and rooted in academic merit. Proposals receiving at least two positive recommendations—either acceptance or acceptance with modifications—were shortlisted, for the second phase total 815 proposals were shortlisted. Phase II Evaluation: It was decided to evaluate the proposal by the committee comprise of renowned academic and Industry experts. During evaluation the applicant was present online and made presentation before the expert committee. | 73 | definition | 0.940 | The evaluation of these proposals were conducted in two Phases: Phase I (screening) and Phase II (recommendation for grant) for selection of the best proposal, which are aligned with RPS lab to market vision. | 1 | page=1,block=5 | 0.700 | |
| What were the two phases in the evaluation of proposals under the RPS lab to market vision? | Phase I (screening) and Phase II (recommendation for grant) | The evaluation of these proposals were conducted in two Phases: Phase I (screening) and Phase II (recommendation for grant) for selection of the best proposal, which are aligned with RPS lab to market vision. Phase I Evaluation: Based on research domain, each proposal was assigned independently to three domain experts for evaluation via RPS Portal. The independent review model ensured that evaluations were unbiased and rooted in academic merit. Proposals receiving at least two positive recommendations—either acceptance or acceptance with modifications—were shortlisted, for the second phase total 815 proposals were shortlisted. Phase II Evaluation: It was decided to evaluate the proposal by the committee comprise of renowned academic and Industry experts. During evaluation the applicant was present online and made presentation before the expert committee. | 64 | list | 0.820 | The evaluation of these proposals were conducted in two Phases: Phase I (screening) and Phase II (recommendation for grant) for selection of the best proposal, which are aligned with RPS lab to market vision. | 1 | page=1,block=5 |
Read straight from the file — download or use the API URL for the full dataset.
| valid |
| 0.700 |
| valid |
| 0.700 |
| valid |
| valid |
| 0.700 |
| valid |